As usual, these threads turn into people praising their own cameras completely ignoring OPs criteria. His second most important requirement was "amazing viewfinder" yet even I see several shit-viewfinder cameras being suggested. Just like in real life: nobody listens, but everyone likes to talk about themselves
As usual, these threads turn into people praising their own cameras completely ignoring OPs criteria. His second most important requirement was "amazing viewfinder" yet even I see several shit-viewfinder cameras being suggested. Just like in real life: nobody listens, but everyone likes to talk about themselves
Which one are you selling next?
I just wanted to thank everyone who's chimed in so far (and thanks to @Old Gregg for trying to keep things on-topic!). Special thanks to those who took the time to read my (lengthy) list of desiderata!
It sounds like so far, the most consistently recommended cameras are the F100 and EOS 1V/1N, followed by whatever @Huss is about to sell (haha). But a number of other intriguing alternatives have been mentioned, too. The most reasonable choice for me would probably be the EOS, as I have a Canon 5D. I don't use it currently and I only have a single lens for it, so I'm not heavily invested but I suppose it would be neat to have a single set of lenses. But I do prefer the design of the Pentax LX and some of the Contax bodies mentioned (thanks, I wouldn't have thought of these!). So plenty to think about.
But I have a bunch of compact scale focus 35mm cameras I should start unloading. As well as some AF ones.
And then all those medium format cameras.. eesh.
Hi all,
I'm GAS-ing and am musing about which next camera I might purchase. Although I'm not sure I'll actually buy anything, I have recently got curious about what my favourite late-film-era SLR would probably be, and I thought it might create a fun discussion. Here's what I'd be looking for:
Things that would be less important to me:
- Excellent metering: something more advanced than centre-weighted. From what I've read, it seems like most manufacturers developed great metering systems in the 80s/90s, with Nikon and Minolta maybe leading the pack. From my point of view, I would like this because I might then feel comfortable leaving my external light meter behind. My most advanced camera currently is a Minolta XE-7, and while I like it, I don't trust its meter enough to shoot in aperture priority.
- Excellent viewfinder: I'd like a very big, bright viewfinder.
- Excellent build: I know it's probably superficial of me, but I love well built cameras. Ideally it would be made entirely of metal.
- Relatively low weight & size: It doesn't have to be super-light, but I wouldn't like something huge with a big vertical grip like the Nikon F5.
- Sub 500 USD in price. That rules out the F6, sadly.
So far, my favourite is the Minolta Maxxum 9. It ticks all the boxes, with the exception of low weight, as it weighs almost 1kg. I also have a soft spot for Minolta, and like its design. But I was wondering what else is out there. The Nikon F100 seems to fit the bill mostly, but I'm not a big fan of its design, and I've heard bad things about its plastics becoming sticky over time, which sounds horrendous. I also just found the Nikon FA, which actually looks quite neat.
- Fast autofocus: I don't shoot fast-moving scenes that much, so the AF wouldn't have to be amazing. It doesn't even have to have autofocus, I don't mind manual focus.
- Lens selection: I might like a 35mm, a 50mm, and an 85mm, but not much more than that.
Anyway, curious to hear your thoughts!
No, no, with the exception of the very 'traditional' "Sticky Mirror Syndrome", nothing happend!So... in constant need of expensive repairs?
Since you said big bright viewfinder, then there is no bigger or brighter then the Pentax LX by any brand or model ever. Fortunately, Pentax also provided the most eye relief as well since they gave the LX the most extensive lineup of viewfinder accessories . . .
...
In these very dark settings, that biggest and brightest viewfinder really comes in handy!
I've tested all my aperture priority capable cameras of different brands and models and none can meter long exposures of only many minutes consistently. And by very long exposure, I have tested both of my LXs to consistently meter up to many hours long which is of course recommended by the various films datasheets to verify reciprocity failure. To date, I have yet to experience any film reciprocity failures with any of the color negatives I have used . . .
Fuji 100 long exposure by Les DMess, on Flickr
I just wanted to thank everyone who's chimed in so far (and thanks to @Old Gregg for trying to keep things on-topic!). Special thanks to those who took the time to read my (lengthy) list of desiderata!
It sounds like so far, the most consistently recommended cameras are the F100 and EOS 1V/1N, followed by whatever @Huss is about to sell (haha). But a number of other intriguing alternatives have been mentioned, too. The most reasonable choice for me would probably be the EOS, as I have a Canon 5D. I don't use it currently and I only have a single lens for it, so I'm not heavily invested but I suppose it would be neat to have a single set of lenses. But I do prefer the design of the Pentax LX and some of the Contax bodies mentioned (thanks, I wouldn't have thought of these!). So plenty to think about.
I was beginning to think something had happened to Les.
Must not be selling any Pentax LX cameras in the near future.Les' spidey sense gets triggered when the term "LX" hits the internet!
He does try to avoid car references. I think LX is a common model trim.
As far as the brightest viewfinder? I did not notice that with mine. The Leica R8/9 and Leicaflex certainly seemed better. Nikons seemed the same. It did not stand out compared to its peers that I also use, at least not that I noticed. I did notice that its meter leds are hard to see in bright light. That stood out.
The Pentax PZ1p is also an awesome camera.
Thanks everyone, and thank you @Les Sarile for the detailed info and interesting experiments on the LX! I do remain a little bit sceptical though: I think you've definitely demonstrated that the LX is excellent at metering long exposures thanks to its film plane meter. But I'm not really interested in long exposures; I'm interested in having a meter that isn't fooled by e.g. backlight, or a black object in the center of the frame. I would think that the matrix system with its image database voodoo could work this out, but if the LX is like other centre-weighted cameras, it would probably be fooled, no?
One point: I never said I think the 5D's viewfinder is exceptional. It's all right. I'm happy with the viewfinder on my Minolta XE-7, which apparently is 0.87x. That would be great! It seems the F100 has 0.76x, and the EOS 1v and 1n have 0.72x. The Dynax 9 has 0.73x. I can't find any exact numbers on the LX, but it seems that some suggest (https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/does-the-lx-have-a-1-1-viewfinder.409616/) that it should be at least 0.9x with the right eye piece, so that's definitely very good.
Must not be selling any Pentax LX cameras in the near future.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Porta 400 has a very real 20 stop range without being pulled.My Pentax LX viewfinder lineup above lists the magnification (M) and diopter (D) range if available.
BTW, if you just want a "proper exposure" with film, even the bare minimum center weighted type can produce that specially if you use color negatives because all you have to do in those "tricky" front/back lit situations is to dial the compensation to overexpose by at least 2 or three stops. Compared to digis, color negatives have so much overexposure latitude. Below, I just kept increasing exposure until I thought I hit the limit of Kodak Portra 400 and Ektar 100 well beyond what I could get with the digis and thought that would be it. Well after I got the rolls back, it seems 10+ stops overexposure was not enough for Portra and 5" was certainly not enough for Ektar. As you can see, I took the 10+ overexposed Portra and with the simplest post work, I could still get a reasonable image.
Kodak Portra 400 overexposure by Les DMess, on Flickr
Just like with the reciprocity testing I do, I also test all my films to see how much over & under exposure I can get away with and still get what I need. For instance in this image captured on Fuji 100, the cameras meter recommends a "proper exposure" at 1/60 but the water flow was so weak, I needed to hold the shutter open for at least 1 second in order to get the water effect I wanted.
Fuji 100-26-26B by Les DMess, on Flickr
So avoiding the meter getting "fooled" is really simple.
My Pentax LX viewfinder lineup above lists the magnification (M) and diopter (D) range if available.
BTW, if you just want a "proper exposure" with film, even the bare minimum center weighted type can produce that specially if you use color negatives because all you have to do in those "tricky" front/back lit situations is to dial the compensation to overexpose by at least 2 or three stop...
...
- Excellent metering: something more advanced than centre-weighted. From what I've read, it seems like most manufacturers developed great metering systems in the 80s/90s, with Nikon and Minolta maybe leading the pack. From my point of view, I would like this because I might then feel comfortable leaving my external light meter behind. My most advanced camera currently is a Minolta XE-7, and while I like it, I don't trust its meter enough to shoot in aperture priority.
- Excellent viewfinder: I'd like a very big, bright viewfinder.
- Excellent build: I know it's probably superficial of me, but I love well built cameras. Ideally it would be made entirely of metal.
- Relatively low weight & size: It doesn't have to be super-light, but I wouldn't like something huge with a big vertical grip like the Nikon F5.
- Sub 500 USD in price. That rules out the F6, sadly.....
- The Nikon F100 seems to fit the bill mostly, but I'm not a big fan of its design, and I've heard bad things about its plastics becoming sticky over time, which sounds horrendous....!
The various modes on the T-70 is a very good alternative to aperture priority. I prefer it to AP in fact.
It’s basically biased programmed modes for different kinds of lenses and action vs still.
Of course manual is also available.
True and I love SP!Its basic AE mode is shutter-priority AE.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?