So I'm currently fixing a Polaris / Beroflex / Raynox / Sigma 85mm f/1.7 lens (as pictured).
The lens is with sort of built-in auto-aperture m42 adapter. It actually has a YS mount behind it - someone in the internet believes this is a Sun Opt. made lens, and I agree. Sold under several names.
Issue was oil on aperture blades, as usual, and they were stuck open. Already cleaned that, BUT
now I noted that the rear group is attached with threads to an another thread that also holds the aperture adjustment ring/lever sandwiched between it. This makes the distance of rear group and front group adjustable by about 0.5mm.
I think there are 3 or 4 lenses in the front group and maybe 3 lenses in the rear group - looks a bit like Sonnar design. Aperture blades are of course between the groups.
Question is, how sensitive this kind of design is for errors in the lens group spacing? I know that Jupiter-9 has a shim or two for adjusting it, but the shims seem to be thick compared to this lense's adjustment range.
The lens is with sort of built-in auto-aperture m42 adapter. It actually has a YS mount behind it - someone in the internet believes this is a Sun Opt. made lens, and I agree. Sold under several names.
Issue was oil on aperture blades, as usual, and they were stuck open. Already cleaned that, BUT
now I noted that the rear group is attached with threads to an another thread that also holds the aperture adjustment ring/lever sandwiched between it. This makes the distance of rear group and front group adjustable by about 0.5mm.
I think there are 3 or 4 lenses in the front group and maybe 3 lenses in the rear group - looks a bit like Sonnar design. Aperture blades are of course between the groups.
Question is, how sensitive this kind of design is for errors in the lens group spacing? I know that Jupiter-9 has a shim or two for adjusting it, but the shims seem to be thick compared to this lense's adjustment range.