I have been metering at 320 and developing in HC110B for 400. Seems like Pancro400 has a broad toe and the shadows can be tricky. I like some of the results though.
Can you describe how you digitized these? I see XT-2 in EXIF, so are these macro shots of negatives or from prints?
The grain looks a bit scanner grain to me, a bit digital.
In post #3 of this thread you described EI 160 and PMK pyro results. Are your new EI and developer recommendations a result of experience over the last 11 months or do you find both combinations equally good?I've used Pancro 400 for several years now, and this is what I have observed:
- this is not a 400 ASA film. I rate it at 125 and only then do I get what I regard as optimal negatives...
- the film behaves well in Xtol, and Pyrocat HD, and can be even better (finer, more even grain, better tonality) when developed in Bergger's own BER49 developer, but its expensive and hard to find (try Freestyle)...
I concur completely....Is the grain acceptable? That depends. I consider the grain coarse enough in 120 format to be barely acceptable, and in 35mm its horrible. In sheet film sizes, its perfectly acceptable, as it becomes imperceptible...
Were those PMK or BER49 developed?...a couple examples of images made on Pancro 400, both 8x10 inch negatives:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51693254128_22b1ee1374_h.jpg
and: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51418363375_25d7d1f257_h.jpg...
If one seeks 8x10, FOTOIMPEX has stock available. I've found shipping from there to the U.S. very reliable lately, with transit times of two weeks or less:...Neither Blue Moon, nor Freestyle, nor B&H currently has any inventory in any format. The lack of availability makes it an even less appealing option right now. Too bad, because the sheet film format is very nice, with aforementioned caveats.
I've used Pancro 400 for several years now, and this is what I have observed:
- this is not a 400 ASA film. I rate it at 125 and only then do I get what I regard as optimal negatives.
- the film base + fog level is very high, no mater how you process the film
- the base material is excessively curly, making it difficult to scan (I'm talking 120 rolls, not sheet film)
- in smaller formats, the grain is very coarse compared to a true 400 ASA film like Tri-X, and it tends to be very clumpy and uneven, again compared to Tri-X.
- the film behaves well in Xtol, and Pyrocat HD, and can be even better (finer, more even grain, better tonality) when developed in Bergger's own BER49 developer, but its expensive and hard to find (try Freestyle)
Do I like what it's capable of? Yes. It can deliver exceptionally nice tonal gradation, which is important to me. Is it more work than I'd like, to get a good result? Yes.
Is the grain acceptable? That depends. I consider the grain coarse enough in 120 format to be barely acceptable, and in 35mm its horrible. In sheet film sizes, its perfectly acceptable, as it becomes imperceptible.
a couple examples of images made on Pancro 400, both 8x10 inch negatives:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51693254128_22b1ee1374_h.jpg
and: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51418363375_25d7d1f257_h.jpg
Although I like the images I get made on Pancro 400, its not very likely that I will include it as a staple of my film arsenal now, simply because its practically vanished from the US marketplace. Neither Blue Moon, nor Freestyle, nor B&H currently has any inventory in any format. The lack of availability makes it an even less appealing option right now. Too bad, because the sheet film format is very nice, with aforementioned caveats.
Lovely shots Mark, thanks for sharing,
@markjwyatt the grain pattern really works for these images, especially the 1st one!
In post #3 of this thread you described EI 160 and PMK pyro results. Are your new EI and developer recommendations a result of experience over the last 11 months or do you find both combinations equally good?
Freestyle sells ADOX ATOMAL 49, which is the same as BER49 and not too expensive, especially in the larger size which might prove more useful when developing any quantity of 8x10 sheets:
I concur completely.Were those PMK or BER49 developed?If one seeks 8x10, FOTOIMPEX has stock available. I've found shipping from there to the U.S. very reliable lately, with transit times of two weeks or less:
FOTOIMPEX even has stock of 11x14:
It seems you'd find it workable for at least two boxes.I have been trying to order the 8x10 from Fotoimpex for some time now, when I try to check out I receive a message stating my order cannot be filled, only 2 boxes available.
Like Paul, if a reliable supply is not going to be available it is really not workable...
...The U.S. distributor (rep) has no answers nor does Freestyle.
I assume Le Duc (owner of Bergger) gets a BIG batch of films being made by InovisCoat (Germany) and finished by Ilford then he can spend the following year or two selling it on world's markets.
Imo the Covid delayed the launch of the new batch but apparently things are moving on.
I assume Le Duc (owner of Bergger) gets a BIG batch of films being made by InovisCoat (Germany) and finished by Ilford then he can spend the following year or two selling it on world's markets.
Imo the Covid delayed the launch of the new batch but apparently things are moving on.
Plaubel Makina 67
Bergger Pancro 400 film developped in Caffenol CLCS 80min @15°-20°C
Scanned with Plustek OpticFilm 120 at 2400dpi with Silverfast AI Studio
Bonnieux • Lubéron • Vaucluse • Provence • France
Caffenol CLCS
500 ml Filtered Water
8gr Anhydrous Washing Soda
5gr Vitamin C
0.5gr KBr
20gr Instant coffee ("Cora")
60 sec. slow agitations then let stand for 79 minutes
Are your "gr" grains or grams, please?
Grams.
To supplement this thread ... last week I bought some Pancro 400 in 35mm format. The expiration date on the box says "08/2026". That suggests it is a fairly recent batch. Keeping fingers crossed for future availability.
There is fresh inventory of 35mm and 120 rolls of Pancro 400 now making its way to retail stores in the US - I know this for a fact...
For you guys exposing it at something other than 400, are you still processing as 400 or pulling it to match the exposure?
Chris
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?