Welcome to the wonderful and often confusing world of processing your own film.
Seeing different development times for the same film/developer combination from different sources indicates one of two likely possibilities: one source is wrong, or the films in the two sources aren't actually the same. In this case, I think it's likely that the IR400/25 and 400/10-25 you see on the Massive Dev Chart isn't the same as the IR 400/27 you have -- and it's also very possible the "Rollei Infrared" listed on the developer concentrate bottle is a different film yet.
There are a couple tools you can look to: for a "similar" film that lists both Rodinal or R09 and some other common developer (D-76, for instance) you can look at the ratio of times, and use the same ratio for your film (so if D-76 1+1 is 9.5 minutes and Rodinal 1:25 is 15 for Reference Film 400, you'd look at the D-76 1+1 time for your version of IR 400 and give 150% plus a little in R09 1:25. You can also look at times for the developer you have for other "similar" films -- for instance, if you have Catlabs 80 and it doesn't show in your reference (I don't offhand know if that one does or doesn't show in the MDC), you'd look for other ISO 80 films like Ilford Classic 80, Shanghai in 80 speed, etc. (assuming you didn't already know Catlabs is Shanghai).
Worst case, you can do a leader test. Drop a clip of 35mm leader into the beaker of developer working solution in the light, and time how long it takes to get fully black (i.e. stop getting darker), and as a starting point develop five times that long. That will get you images that you can probably print and almost certainly scan, and you can adjust future development time for that same combination based on whether the contrast is too high, too low, or just about right.