Of course you aren't nuts. To each his own. No disrespect intended. I found it surprising that someone presumed an individual point-of-view was an insult.Gim said:I may be missing something here but under real low light conditions I would think a brighter GG would be a help to focus. I just order a Satinsnow GG for this purpose. Maybe I'm just nuts.
Jim
jjstafford said:That makes no sense at all. You should know the frame. You can look outside of the camera/ground glass. Sorry, but I can't understand why your are so groundglass handicapped. Don't lay the blame on me. Look to yourself.
Correct - it is merely a personal preference of some, and not for some others.Early Riser said:JJS, I've spent more than 30 years looking through the ground glass of view cameras, as I approach the half century mark my eyes are not as good as they once were, and my need for an enhanced GG has grown in proportion to the deterioration of my eyesight. The use of a bright screen or fresnel is not a matter of one's experience or skill level. Being able to carefully study one's framing of a photograph prior to exposure is not a bad thing or a sign of inexperience.
SLNestler said:They finally have a website:
http://www.mattclara.com/maxwell/index.html#Screens
The cost of a 4X5, I believe is somewhere between $200 and $300. It would be interesting to test it side by side with the Satin Snow.
David A. Goldfarb said:If you use a booster to meter off the glass, a brighter screen should also give more accurate readings.
David H. Bebbington said:Is this the ultimate answer?
jjstafford said:Of course you aren't nuts. To each his own. No disrespect intended. I found it surprising that someone presumed an individual point-of-view was an insult.Quote
Insulted.....I don't think so...This is funny. Looks like your looking for some kind of an argument. All I said was that under low light conditions a brighter GG might would help to focus. Insult. You could not insult me if you wanted to.
Jim
Gim said:I was replying to someone else. Let's let it go, lest the thread lead to more misunderstandings.jjstafford said:Of course you aren't nuts. To each his own. No disrespect intended. I found it surprising that someone presumed an individual point-of-view was an insult.Quote
Insulted.....I don't think so...This is funny. Looks like your looking for some kind of an argument. All I said was that under low light conditions a brighter GG might would help to focus. Insult. You could not insult me if you wanted to.
Jim
David H. Bebbington said:Is this the ultimate answer?
Can't you just see Annie Hall wearing them?colrehogan said:Since when are ladies going to wear a bowler hat and wing collar?
David H. Bebbington said:Is this the ultimate answer?
Charles Webb said:I have all three of the above mentioned items, The Bowler hat in my size,
the winged coller I have worn for cowboy action shooting along with the Akubra. I have found the three items to be of excellent quality and manufacture. They however do not in any way enhance or give aid in achieving a better photographic image. I am sorry, but it is the truth!
I am very pleased with Dave Parkers screens!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?