Personal taste more than anything else. I prefer a slightly grainier/ traditional look.
I found the delta 100/ perceptol mix almost looked like a mono water colour or dare I say it ... prints from a digital camera with no noise added, than silver photography and despite to-ing and fro-ing between tan/stain developers and non T/S ones, I'm pretty much settled on FP4+ / hp5+ and a metol/catechol developer - there is something about the way highlight tones are rendered using a T/S stain that I dont get from perceptol. I'm sure there'll be a million people who say that is "nonsense and with good technique and d-76 exactly the same results could be gained etc etc", but from my subjective experience, that is the way I like it to be.
Thank you very much for the advice.
I am still trying to understand tab-grain films, and I tend to agree more and more with Anchell and Troop who say that it's a scam from the manufacturers wanting to use less silver:rolleyes: .
Once I found somewhere a description of tab films as having the tonality of "black and white TV", and to me it sounds more and more true.
I don't believe in taking a film and raping it until it loses its main characteristics.
If I shoot ortho, I want the contrast, no point in using low contrast developers. If I don't want grain, than I'll grab a large format camera.
So for example if I don't want my film to look like b/w television, then I don't use tab films, instead of using bizarre/arcane developers.
Anyways, thanks for the wonderful advice.