Diapositivo
Subscriber
I'm going to Paris for a couple weeks next month. I plan to walk a lot, and to take a lot of pictures. I could either bring my film gear, but that's heavy, or choose a lighter approach: my digital camera (which covers 24-120mm equivalent in a small and light package), a very light Bessa-L (film) with the 15mm, flash, lightmeter, that's all (apart the tripod for the evening). That would allow me to be much more "productive".
This second, lighter approach, has a problem. My Sony DSC-R1 takes 20MB per raw frame (no compression available). That's 50 frames per GB. Raw is a must I am not considering shooting in JPEG. If the weather is good and I get out taking pictures morning, afternoon and maybe evening, it's easy to go around 6 GB per day (that would be coherent with 6 rolls per day or so, with digital I tend to shoot a bit more copiously). Until now, when I went somewhere with my digital, I also brought with me my old notebook: every evening I would copy all images from the flash cards to the notebook.
This time I fly and I don't want to bring the notebook with me for various reasons. I'm looking for a different solution.
I think I have two possible alternatives in front of me:
1) Buy several cheap 8GB compact flash cards. That might turn out expensive, not as expensive as film, but expensive. If the whether assists me and the force with me is, in two weeks I can expect to shoot more than 60 GB of raw files, possibly 80 GB. Ten cheap cards would cost around €100. I would have no backup. If one card fails, all its content is lost.
[Side question: do I risk anything at airports? Some kind of magnetic check which could erase the flash memory content?]
2) Buy some sort of portable hard disk or other mass storage device where I could pour the pictures every time I go home. Two would be better, as I would have two copies in case of a hard disk failure. The problem with this solution is that I don't know where to look for solutions that do not require having a computer with me. The contraption should either be able to suck the files directly from my camera, or be able to suck them directly from a Compact Flash card. Also, this solution makes sense if I can buy two units. If I buy only one, the risk of putting all eggs in one basket is unacceptable and I would prefer solution 1.
So the questions are:
How risky is solution 1? I have never had a flash card fail so far, but I only had three.
What options do I have for solution 2? Would I find some hard-disks able to connect directly to the camera, or flash memory, with around 60 or 80 GB of storage? At which costs? I would be grateful for pointers somewhere.
Thanks
Fabrizio
This second, lighter approach, has a problem. My Sony DSC-R1 takes 20MB per raw frame (no compression available). That's 50 frames per GB. Raw is a must I am not considering shooting in JPEG. If the weather is good and I get out taking pictures morning, afternoon and maybe evening, it's easy to go around 6 GB per day (that would be coherent with 6 rolls per day or so, with digital I tend to shoot a bit more copiously). Until now, when I went somewhere with my digital, I also brought with me my old notebook: every evening I would copy all images from the flash cards to the notebook.
This time I fly and I don't want to bring the notebook with me for various reasons. I'm looking for a different solution.
I think I have two possible alternatives in front of me:
1) Buy several cheap 8GB compact flash cards. That might turn out expensive, not as expensive as film, but expensive. If the whether assists me and the force with me is, in two weeks I can expect to shoot more than 60 GB of raw files, possibly 80 GB. Ten cheap cards would cost around €100. I would have no backup. If one card fails, all its content is lost.
[Side question: do I risk anything at airports? Some kind of magnetic check which could erase the flash memory content?]
2) Buy some sort of portable hard disk or other mass storage device where I could pour the pictures every time I go home. Two would be better, as I would have two copies in case of a hard disk failure. The problem with this solution is that I don't know where to look for solutions that do not require having a computer with me. The contraption should either be able to suck the files directly from my camera, or be able to suck them directly from a Compact Flash card. Also, this solution makes sense if I can buy two units. If I buy only one, the risk of putting all eggs in one basket is unacceptable and I would prefer solution 1.
So the questions are:
How risky is solution 1? I have never had a flash card fail so far, but I only had three.
What options do I have for solution 2? Would I find some hard-disks able to connect directly to the camera, or flash memory, with around 60 or 80 GB of storage? At which costs? I would be grateful for pointers somewhere.
Thanks
Fabrizio