backpack recommendations

Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 103
sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 2
  • 0
  • 126
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 159
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 3
  • 2
  • 176

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,196
Messages
2,787,695
Members
99,835
Latest member
Onap
Recent bookmarks
0

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
Hey all,

I currently have a Kata 3N1-30 and Crumpler 7 Million Dollar Home. They can both fit either my RZ67 or 4x5 systems, but the Crumpler causes me serious back pain due to the asymmetrical shoulder loading once I get 12kg in there and walk for 10km. I'd like to get another backpack a bit like the Kata, preferably with a little more room and absolutely no less than 30L.

Has anyone got recommendations for current model photo backpacks with a strong hip strap (to unload the shoulders), plenty of padding including velcro dividers, no laptop compartment and around 30-35L of volume? The ability to strap on a tripod (like the Kata has) is desirable. Under $200, cheaper and lightly-used is fine if you want to get rid of one! (I just missed a 3N1-30 for $80 shipped on eBay due to not paying attention)
 

Nuff

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
581
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Format
Multi Format

Attachments

  • photo.JPG
    photo.JPG
    60 KB · Views: 128

Barry Kirsten

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
68
Location
Brookfield, Vic. Au.
Format
Multi Format
I can't remember where I got this info, possibly when I was buying a Photobackpacker outfit for carrying 4x5 gear, but I distinctly remember being told that the aim of a good backpack was to distribute the load across the hips, not the shoulders. I remember this advice was contrary to what many people, myself included, assume about backpacks. For sure, smaller packs probably load the shoulders, but large photo backpacks extend down to the hip region and I understand the design rationale is that the load is carried down low to prevent back pain.
 
OP
OP
polyglot

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
Nuff: the ThinkTank seems to be 25L if you multiply out the internal dimensions. It'd probably be 30 if it didn't have the laptop compartment, which is why I'm looking for one without. I don't carry a laptop, so such compartments are just wasted mass+volume to me.

Barry: exactly. That's why I'm looking for one with a good hip strap. The Kata is pretty good in this respect - I've done 20km walks with it, no trouble.
 

Dr Croubie

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,986
Location
rAdelaide
Format
Multi Format
I've got a Lowepro Pro-runner 350AW that's got a decent hip-strap support system. Looks like Nuff's just a bit thinner overall, that looks like a 35mm camera end-on next to the tri-x?
It's not the deepest thing in the world though, can get my 7D/3 in there fine, P6/K60/Hasselbladski with WLF only, gotta take off the prism, so maybe an RZ would be a bit big, but there is the 450 that's bigger than mine.
edit: just checked B+H, my 350 is 11cm-deep and the 450 is 17cm deep internally. They've both got laptop slots, but honestly (at least with my laptop) it's too thick to fit in. If you don't have a Mac Air or something, just accept the laptop slot as extra spine padding.
Twincity (grenfell/adelaide arcade) had a decent range when I got mine, it's worth going in to check them out and try on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rince

Member
Joined
May 11, 2011
Messages
219
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I would also recommend the ThinkTank Streetwalker. Even though I do not carry a laptop with me either, I like the extra space for film holders with convenient access. I usually put my film holders in a neopren sleeve for extra protection. Also it is the most comfortable backpack I ever owned. Plenty of room in there for my RZ a couple of lenses and my ShenHao 4x5 at the same time with all the essential accessories I usually need. I would say it is at least worth a closer look.
 

coigach

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
1,593
Location
Scotland
Format
Multi Format
A backpack for carrying any proper weight (as opposed to a day sac) should definitely fit your hips and let them take the weight. Your shoulders will thank you...:smile:

You might find this thread useful?:
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Regular Rod

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
665
Location
Derbyshire
Format
Medium Format
Can you reconsider your budget? If so then take a long look at Photobackpacker. It's a system for life. The reduction in fatigue is amazing, giving you a longer range and more enthusiasm and energy for the photography when you get there. I use mine for 8x10 and wouldn't part with it. Not only is it very comfortable to wear, but the clever way the "boxes" go together inside the backpack means that you are more or less automatically organised in the field. Personally, I have certainly never been so well organised as the Photobackpacker now "makes" me.

Being in Australia, you have an advantage right now in that shipping is currently free world wide.

Dead Link Removed

If you get lost in the specification process on the website (I did) just email Bruce and he will help you.

I have no connection with Photobackpacker other than being a very delighted customer.

RR
 

nwilkins

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
420
Location
Nova Scotia,
Format
Medium Format
I have a lowepro pro runner 350 aw which has good hip support. it fits:

RB67 body
4 lenses
2x120 backs
filters and hoods
lots of film
chimney finder
light meter
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,652
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
I have used a Tamrac 787 for fifteen years in all types of weather and at times when loaded weight up to thirty pounds and can agree that a pack that is adjustable for both fit and organization is well worth the price. Consider the cost of the equipment it is loaded with, durability over a long period of time and avoiding visits to your friendly orthopedist make investing in a proper backpack a good decision.

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/
 

photobackpacker

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
430
Location
Minnesota
Format
4x5 Format
Polygot:

The key to getting "felt weight reduction" is fit. With an excellent fit, your load will feel lighter than it is. Fit involves 3 critical elements - torso length, waist size and chest size.

If you are hiking long distances or want the option to do so, look at packs that have the ability to match your torso length, waist and chest sizes. One size will not fit all.

Good Luck.

Bruce
 

Kirks518

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
1,494
Location
Flori-DUH
Format
Multi Format
LowePro Flipside 400AW - huge hipstraps, big enough, and excellent weight distribution. And can be had for $58 on ebay, or $129 from BH/Adorama.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
If you can find them Tamrack 750 or 752 backpacks are well designed and have belts to transfer the weight to the hips. I use them for my Hasselblads and 4"x5" cameras
 

Old_Dick

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
396
Location
03082
Format
Multi Format
From John Reed in http://www.largeformatphotography.info

"We are going to Yellowstone/Grand Tetons in the middle of July and I'm, of course, taking my Sinar F1 along for the ride."
"I've got he whole rig in a backpack using a Renaissance set up. I did over six miles on Inishmor last month. Not bad for three score and ten."

Dick
 

ceeras

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
2
Format
Multi Format
I very recently acquired a P3 pack from Photobackpacker. At the same time, I ordered two MF/SLR enclosures (one for RB67, one for 35mm/DSLR). The pack has ample capacity and appears to have high build quality. As a veteran (but not recent) backpacker, I can say that the suspension system is astonishingly good, and following the instructions to get a perfect fit was not terribly difficult. It fits me like a glove. The pack also fits the enclosure like a glove, of course, and each enclosure each arrived with more than enough partitioning materials to get the job done. Carrying the RB with 90mm and 180mm lenses, Luna-Pro, three backs, two viewfinders, shade, filters, tripod and the usual small items is a walk in the park compared with carrying the tripod on one shoulder and everything else in a shoulder bag. Alternatives to the enclosure kits are available. The downside is that Photobackpacker will soon close its doors, so time is of the essence. On the other hand, prices are ridiculously low. Like RR, I have no connection with Photobackpacker other than my status as a very happy customer. - ceeras
 

Kilgallb

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
813
Location
Calgary AB C
Format
4x5 Format
The problem with a Lowepro label is you might as well write steal me on the bag.

I use an old Mountain Equipment back pack complete with Canadian flag. I put my camera inside an inner bag and can pack lenses and accessories in other small containers.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
I like my Mountainsmith and Lowepro photo backpacks for lots of gear and hiking.

But I'm thinking of a sling style bag when walking with less gear and more urban environments. I want something that I can get at without setting it down but more comfortable than a shoulder bag. My "kit" would be a Nikon F100 with mid-range zoom, a wide angle prime, small flash, and maybe a longer zoom. If for no other reason than the height of the camera body, a larger sling bag would be necessary.

Any experience with sling style bags and whether they fulfill the promise of comfortable carry and easy access?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom