Thanks for the well-wishes Suzanne
I am not a complete stranger to wrinkly wet hands and the smell of fixer. And I will still be doing the kitchen sink developing of B&W negatives. Not sure when, but I see myself leaning over the edge of the bathtub, watching for the pull time of developing prints. The main hinderance to setting up a darkroom was/is my lack of space to dedicate to an enlarger. I'm in the hybrid mode. I believe a good film negative gives me the most information to work with. I have yet to see if wet process on silver and other emulsions can mask the use of a "digital enlarger". I have seen some interesting posts on this forum today, and would appreciate any advice on options towards making good color and B&W prints from scans with the equipment I have.
It has been a couple of years since I aquired PS and a decent scanner. I chose the Epson Perfection 2450 because of its reputation for decent scans of 4x5 format in its price range. I can get some near instant feedback of the recorded image using Polaroid 55 P/N and scanning and digitally printing. Just did the first one last Tue.
In B&W, I print with MIS Quadtone inks on my old Epson Stylus Color 740. I get decent prints -not what most people would consider "Fine Art", but very usable as viewing size proofs at full sheet, and I still have a negative for fine printing at a custom lab or contact prints. It will take a while to replace some items I left behind in my move from Hawaii, but I hope, in the not to distant future to be contact printing 4x5 and mounting with a generous mat border.
I feel one can get serviceable color prints with the proper inkset/paper combination from scanned transparencies. Again, seeing the image at a decent viewing size; i.e. 8x10, 11x17, I can better judge which images qualify for a better quality custom lab print. I am currently printing color with the Epson 1280 and the Epson inkset on Ilford's Gallerie Classic Pearl finish giclee paper. It is a resin coated paper with an amazing tonal range and claims (not Ilford's) of 20 year fade resistance. I have to admit that the leaning curve for these processes are pretty steep. User forums like APUG have been immensely helpful. In a venue where so many aspects of equipment and technique are changing so rapidly, one cannot have too many teachers.
So much to look forward to! Got a week off to re-visit some areas I had scouted out the last couple of years. I hope to bring back something to post.
michael