Congratulations! I'm glad you got 2 outa 3. When I started in high school, my first couple rolls were crap and unusable. Nothing makes you want to give up like total failure!
Keep it up, and perhaps you can convince the rest of the photo club to try out developing film
These days, sending films to labs aren't guarantee that they will come back usable. After few more practice, I think, you would be able to do a fine job doing it on your own. Just don't do it in a hurry and make easily avoidable mistakes.... such as putting fixer first and developer next... like I did many years ago and I nearly did yesterday. (if you do... you'll have absolutely nothing on film!)
With the fixer that I use, I remove the film from the tank after 2 minutes and do a quick inspection. If the film is milky, I put it back in the fixer for another minute and recheck. If it is clear at the next inspection then I fix it for another 3 minutes. If, on the first inspection the film has cleared, then I fix it for another 2 minutes. I believe the rule is to fix for twice as long as it takes to clear. I also keep track of the amount of film that I have fixed with a batch of fixer. Different fixers have different amounts of film that can be fixed. It is usually listed on the paper that comes with the fixer. I calculate it out then when it has reached that amount I dispose of it. I can do inspections by removing a short length of film from the reel because I use stainless steel reels and they can be loaded when wet. The plastic patterson reels can not be loaded when wet or damp for that matter.
So what kind of film are you using?? What kind of camera??
You are lucky, Tareq, for having a lab near by that will serve your needs and work with you. Amazingly enough (or not), many of us in US aren't that lucky. Anyway, congratulation for processing your own film.
American business sees nothing other than profit. So there's less money in film these days and labs that will develop B&W are dwindling. I have to send mine away as well. That's changing,at least for the negatives at first.
There is a section in APUG that has some instructional videos. Click on the videos tab near the top of the page. Look for the series of "Darkroom" videos. Watch the four part series "How to Develop B&W Roll Film" by Jason Brunner.
OK, i've done one developing film, and it seems i failed this time, could be my developing process was not done properly.
Thank you very much!
OK, i've done one developing film, and it seems i failed this time, could be my developing process was not done properly.
Thank you very much!
It is difficult to know what you are doing without being with you but at the risk of appearing to insult your intelligence, all I can say is that if you have loaded the film in the dark so no light has fogged the film and if you have mixed the developer according to the manufacturer's instructions and developed for the right time at the right temp according to the manufacturer's instructions then you should be getting very good negatives. Manufacturer's times produce good negs.
If you then fix according to instructions and then wash, everything should be right. There are two patterns of agitation. In one you agitate by inversion for 30 sec then 2-3 inversions every 30 sec. In the other( Ilford) you invert for 10 secs for 4-5 inversions then do so again for 10 secs every minute.
Fixing agitation is less important but try the same as for developing.
Provided that you are agitating to either pattern above then it is unlikely that your agitation is the cause of failure.
When you say you have failed can you describe what the failed negs look like?
pentaxuser
I followed that of Ilford agitation i think, 10 secs for 5 inversions then same every minute.
I think the failure i am talking about is that the frames all came our so dense, black with some fine at the edges, means all the shots are blown out with vignetting, i didn't scan yet, but it seems maybe my exposure time was not good, or the developing process affect my exposed ASA maybe.
OK I think we can rule out your agitation being any problem. If all the negs are very dense then it suggests you may have overexposed the film. I think we can take it that you will not have overdeveloped it as you will have followed the instructions for the correct speed of film used.
Let's assume that your film had a manufacturer's speed of 400 . It may be that you had set the speed on the camera wrong or have moved the the film speed dial without realising it.
The other cause might be that your camera's meter or the meter you use is seriously wrong.
Where you live means that the sunny f16 rule should apply when it is sunny which it must be most days. This says that at aperture f16 the meter should give an exposure of the reciprocal of the film speed so 1/400th of a second.
Have a look at your meter. If the exposure is much different from this then it might be that your meter is wrong. So if the meter says only 1/125th of a second then it is two stops wrong and it means you are developing a 400 film as is it was an ISO 125 film. This will give dense negs but they should still be printable in a darkroom .
The meter would have to be very wrong to give negs that were unprintable. I cannot give any advice on how you scan and then do hybrid prints. I don't know anything about scanning and this area more properly belongs to the hybrid photo section.
pentaxuser
Thank you very much!
I think it is an issue of exposure, my developing is fine from what i can see [i can see the type of film clear, and i scanned one frame of the neg, the well exposed came out great, but the shot is overexposed so much on another corners].
In fact i was using Holga Pinhole 120WPC, i struggle to read the exposure meter for this camera at all.
I must admit that I know nothing of Holgas but it may be that a Holga pinhole 120WPC isn't the best camera to be using when learning developing and printing. It may give you problems that other cameras do not and this may make learning more difficult.
Anyway it sounds as if we have eliminated your developing process as the problem which is good.
pentaxuser
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?