B+W 092 vs Hoya RM72...

Hydrangeas from the garden

A
Hydrangeas from the garden

  • 2
  • 2
  • 58
Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 6
  • 1
  • 70
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 16
  • 9
  • 150
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 5
  • 1
  • 85

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,917
Messages
2,766,850
Members
99,503
Latest member
free-range kiwi
Recent bookmarks
1

walter23

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
1,206
Location
Victoria BC
Format
4x5 Format
I've seen these both listed as being a wratten #89B equivalent... is this true? Why is the B+W cheaper than the hoya?

I need a filter to get a nice IR effect with Ekfe IR820. I'm running low on kodak HIE sheets :sad:
 

Helen B

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
1,590
Location
Hell's Kitch
Format
Multi Format
From (there was a url link here which no longer exists)

"Here, to the best of my knowledge, are the 50% transmission wavelengths for some common filters, to the nearest 5 nm. Heliopan filters are given their Schott RG numbers, which correspond to the 50% transmission wavelength.

Wratten # 25 (Old designation: A): 600 nm
Wratten # 29 (Old designation: F): 620 nm
B+W 091 (Schott RG630): 630 nm
B+W 092 (Schott RG695): 695 nm
Wratten # 89B: 715 nm
Hoya R72: 720 nm
Wratten # 88A: 745 nm
Wratten # 87: 795 nm
B+W 093 (Schott RG830): 830 nm
Wratten 87C: 850 nm

All Wratten data from Kodak Photographic Filters Handbook, B-3, 1992

The B+W Handbook gives the Schott glass used for each filter. The Schott website gives complete spectral data, but it isn't really necessary for obtaining the 50% transmission values."


From that information the 89B is similar to the R72, but the 092 is not. This corresponds with my experience with the R72 and the 092.

Best,
Helen
 
OP
OP

walter23

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
1,206
Location
Victoria BC
Format
4x5 Format
Ahh, great. This corroborates what I've now heard and read elsewhere.
 

Rui.Cardoso

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
19
Location
Portugal
Format
Medium Format
Hello,

I used, the B+W 092 with the old Maco IR 820c with good IR effects.

When the Maco was replaced by Rollei IR, I tryed this film with the B+W 092, and because I could not get a strong effect with this combo I tried both the Hoya R72 and the Heliopan RG715, my findings where that the Hoya was the stronger of the three, (1 to two stops slower than the B+W, with the Heliopan RG715 somewhere in the middle).

I only shot one test roll with the Efke IR820 to date, and surprisingly I do not see big differences from the three filters at the same ISO ratings: I got a very good IR effect between ISO 6 and 3 with any of the filters (quite similar to the looks of the old Maco)...

I'll be boing some more tests during the next weeks, so I'll let you know if I find something different from this.

Regarding the price differences, I also do not understand them. The Hoya is pretty much inexpensive up to 67mm (the one I use), over this the price gets completely insane. In terms of build the B+W and the Heliopan are equally excellent, the Hoya does not look as solid, but I still didn't have problems with any of them.

Regards,

-Rui
 

Tom Stanworth

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
2,021
Format
Multi Format
all thing being equal, I cannot recommend enought the MRC B&W filters; they really are superbly made and have a great coating. I guess the wavelength transmission might be your primary concern. I have some MC hoyas too, but after the B&Ws...that is all I will not buy in glass circular filters. Superb.
 

Helen B

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
1,590
Location
Hell's Kitch
Format
Multi Format
Tom,

Have you been able to get MRC versions of the 092 or 093? If so, wheere from?

Thanks,
Helen
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom