Any idea what it does to the warranty?
I've owned Epson printers for digital work for 20 years now and not one could I leave sit for longer than 3 - 4 days without getting a clogged nozzle (or, a few.) But, I do live in the desert where it's extremely dry much of the year. That said, the best way I've heard to store an Epson printer for any extended length of time is to run PiezoFlush solution (https://shop.inkjetmall.com/PiezoFlush-Solution-220ml.html) through it via nozzle checks until no color is seen. Jose Rodriquez on YouTube just recently did a video about this so check it out, if you're interested.
I gave up on Epson and switched to Canon. As long as a print once every week to two weeks, even a test image everything is good. I have left it for a month with no issue.
I have a Canon PIXMA Pro 10. Print quality is as good as my form Epson.
If you want to avoid a clogging Epson, get a Canon. Life is too short to bother with Epson. If you want to avail yourself of a monochrome inkset, then you have to get an Epson and deal with it. There are all kinds of writeups out there about how to use an Epson to make digital negs which is a plus. Not any that I am aware of for Canon, though I will probably do one myself one of these days. It is too bad HP stopped making smaller printers. Their large format printers are excellent.
I also have a newer Epson P9000. It's clogged two or three times in the three, maybe four years that I've owned it. And it always comes clean right away with a regular head cleaning when it does. So I can say that Epson pretty much solved the clogging issue with that model. However, I did have a head go bad after about two years, and that was an expensive repair. It could have been an outlier. But so far, it hasn't proven as reliable (outside of the clogging) as the old one.
I've had similar experience. Three Epsons over many years. Finally (on the advice of a colleague) bought a Canon Pixma Pro-100. I print infrequently, but every time I turn it on, it just works. Yes they are not pigment inks, but I'm beginning the think those inks aren't worth the trouble. And, someday, someone will solve the digital negative issue with non-pigment inks.
My guess is that CANON Pro 100 which is an ink printer, not pigment printer like my Pro 10, would serve for big negs. No company is worse than Epson. Epson re-packages some fine papers under it's accursed brand...probably an overlooked opportunity to get worse. If I wanted big contact negs I'd make them with a small enlarger from Salvation Army.
The reason why I have stuck with Epson is the ability to use QTR... which allows me to profile, and control how much ink is laid down. Pick what works for you. I don't use Epson inks either. I prefer refillable cartridges, and an all black set (expect one yellow).
I appreciate the thoughts. The p400 uses pigment ink, according to the website. What is the difference between 8 colors in the p400 and the 9 colors in the P600 when it comes to digital negatives.
Since I will be the main user, and the main reason for this purchase is to do digital negatives, and there is NO tried and true digital negative method published and explained to be used with canon printers, and the fact that I am only going this route because I want to contact print bigger than 8x10 in the near future, and the fact I do not want to waste money on something that that might or might not work, I will not be buying a canon. I am sure the color prints are great but the main purpose of this is not color prints.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?