For Sale Aus - 4x5" Box of Pro 160S + 400ft of 35mm Vision1 500T

The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 8
  • 2
  • 60
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33
Centre Lawn

A
Centre Lawn

  • 2
  • 2
  • 49

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,908
Messages
2,782,940
Members
99,745
Latest member
Larryjohn
Recent bookmarks
0
Trader history for Athiril (0)

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
Pro 160S box is 125g, 10 sheets, June 2011.
$35


500T 35mm 400ft roll suits 35mm bulk loading - if you cant find someone to remove the remjet for C-41 process - I can do that for you :wink:

I've got one other can with 300ft left but I think I'll keep that, you got to rewind it onto a spool in the bulk loader in a change bag (what I do), or you can load it directly onto canisters with the spiny handle part stuck in the bottom of the canister, keep your hand over the edges of the reel of film so it doesnt come apart. Tape down the end of the film when done so it stays tight.
$65

35 N4740 (1866) EI
5279 193 3101
(c) 1996 < ~15 years old.

Tin is 1.1kg. $13 Express including cost of packaging (about the same as regular for the weight).. but check auspost.com.au! 17.5cmx17.5cmx4cm 1.1kg
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

And some of us are in the process of finding out a reliable way to get ECN-II processing of short rolls from still cameras. So far so good, so you can buy this and get it processed the way it was supposed to be.
 
OP
OP
Athiril

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
I've mixed up the ECN-2 recipe following the Kodak publication with also several variations, I havent seen benefit to it v C-41.
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
I understand that x-processing it as C-41 compromises its archival stability, but IDK. Just hoping to plug your sale.
 
OP
OP
Athiril

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
Iirc it's not archival to begin with right? I dont think stabilisers were part of the ECN-2 process (if I remember), using actual stabiliser on the film then should be better for the long term.
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
As far as I know, it should be just as archival as C-41, when processed in the right stuff. I believe that the print films are less archival, since they are produced in mass quantities for projection. This film though, seeing as it's the original footage shot in the camera, should be as archival as anything or Paramount's gonna want their money back!

I recall PE having something to say about it.. I mean... the Oracle.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom