Astrophotography and Ilford Delta 3200

Hydrangeas from the garden

A
Hydrangeas from the garden

  • 2
  • 1
  • 28
Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 4
  • 1
  • 54
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 12
  • 8
  • 109
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 5
  • 1
  • 63
Life Ring

A
Life Ring

  • 4
  • 2
  • 57

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,909
Messages
2,766,733
Members
99,500
Latest member
Neilmark
Recent bookmarks
1

digic

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
23
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
Has anyone here really tried this extensively? I'm interested in attempting something like this. Any results to show off?
 

litody

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
39
Format
35mm
No I haven't tried it. But I have to ask why? The grain large by comparison with the much slower films so the fine detail people usually require in astro images just won't be there.
 

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format
Subscribed. I've been wondering about this myself for years. I figure if you had a good mount that tracked, some images should be usable. You're gonna make me dig out my 10" scope...
 

pcsaba1981

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2012
Messages
28
Format
35mm
I made some moon photos recently at Fuji Neopan 1600, I'm waiting for the results :smile:
Anyway, I think for astrophotography there is not too much sense to use grainy film.

To be honest I think for astrophotography really the digital rules, not the film.

Please have a look at the home-page of my favorite astro-photographer: http://www.astroeder.com/deepsky/deepsky.htm
He has many film photos as well, either 120 or 35mm format.
 
OP
OP

digic

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
23
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
I guess i ask this out of ignorance. I've attempted some using digital, where high ISO is usually the way to go, so I sort of figured the same here. But after I posted this thread I found some stuff on flickr such as 30-45 minute exposures with Neopan Acros 100 that looked incredible, and I've got a bunch of that (as well as Provia 400X).
Mainly scope-less. I figured I'd take my Hassy 500 CM out a clear, cold Norwegian winter night.
 

Jerry Thirsty

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
283
Format
35mm
While I haven't tried either of these for astrophotography, it wouldn't surprise me if Acros 100 isn't actually faster than Delta 3200 when you get out past several minutes of exposure (due to the large difference in their reciprocity characteristics). Delta needs 150 seconds to get 30 seconds worth of exposure, but Acros just says +1/2 stop out to about 17 minutes.
 

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format
I was thinking the same thing. I've ran Acros for a long, long time with no reciprocity issues....
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom