• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Aspect ratios and paper annoyance.


I crop before photographing, but that has not stopped me from later cropping in dark room if I see it as an improvement.
 
I crop before photographing, but that has not stopped me from later cropping in dark room if I see it as an improvement.

We all crop when we choose a camera and format -- and again when we choose a focal length and lens. We just don't think of that as cropping, but it is. So if it's done before we trip the shutter or after, the result is the same.
 
Cropping may not work if the original angle of the shot is wrong. Also, the balance may work in the original and be lost when cropping. Also, cropping from let;s say 4x5 may cut off feet or parts of heads when trying to fit let's say 4x6 . The point is shooting widely figuring you can crop later may not work for various reasons.
 
On the other hand, when I switched my camera to shoot 16:9 to match the 16:9 video shots, it took me less than a half hour to adjust to composing "by the rules." and normal aesthetic composition. Again, trying to cut down 16:9 afterward to a different aspect ratio has the same issue as in my last post.
 
Cropping, of course, can't change the location of the camera, but lots of photographers intentionally use a wider lens to make sure everything gets included -- especially if you can't back up. Adding in a little post-exposure cropping is much better than regretting that you left something out. I've done both!!!
 

Other than retaking the photograph, nothing can correct a poor choice for the original angle of the photograph.