LOL!BWKate said:Do not send photos of buildings or cars to Robert if you get him in an exchange!!!!!
Jeanette, you're such a hoot!BWGirl said:So lots of help, aren't I Art? haha
Hi Dave, I think that's an excellent idea. I hope that people would not be 'afraid' to PM me their constraints. It's completely understandable.dschneller said:If there may be a postal burden for some participants they could possibly indicate that before the pairings are made.
Kate, Robert and David (others),BWKate said:I'm with David on the sending and receiving prints from faraway places. It's part of the appeal.
Newbie thoughts are most welcome. Sometimes it takes a new perspective on things to set'em straight again. I hope you'll particpate in the next round.jlsmackenzie said:Those are just a few of my thoughts as a newbie!
I totally agree. Like I said, I think he's on to something good. Exchanges are a way to develop the APUG community. Hopefully folks will 'graduate' to the larger one, one day! Heck, these are so fun, I'd personally like to do them all.David A. Goldfarb said:There's no reason there can't be regional print exchanges like Dave Miller's as well as big international print exchanges like this one. The more the merrier!
David A. Goldfarb said:If you want to exchange with many people, join the Group Exchange, rather than the Blind Exchange. In the Group Exchange the organizer forms groups of about 4-6 people, and you print up enough for the whole group. I suppose you could join two groups if you wanted to print ten prints. The Alt-Process Exchange works this way too, with groups of 3-4.
jeroldharter said:Why not let people exchange with as many others as desired versus exchanging with just one person? Some parts of the year I might want to exchange with 10 people and other times none for example.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?