I take the best photos I can, i.e. as finely crafted as I am able, of things that interest me on a deep level.
Whether or not they are art is for someone else to decide.
Well, getting artie is not the same as making art. And even when making art, a lot ends up in the trash. Tons of hard work is involved if one wants to make photographs that are more than just occasionally satisfactory...and from both sides -- working to see and working to hone the craft. Then when one gets to a point where one is making more than satisfactory photographs -- a new level opens up and one's past work is again only occasionally satisfactory, and there is work to do!
I think there are two types of working photographic artists. The highly gifted/talented individual with fresh new ideas and ways of expressing things...like rockets firing up into the art world. Then there are those who practice their craft and improve their eye over decades. Galleries and the romantic types love the first. Goodwill get the frames after the latter dies. I am somewhere in between.
I consider myself a learning artist.O.k I seem to take some good photos of things/places/people I like (generally) and really enjoy doing it and looking at the results but as soon as I try and get artie with my photos they end up trash. Do you think much like other art you have to have an artistic bent even before you start to make good artistic photos. For me capturing a memory is the most important bit but I do like looking at artistic photos much like I like looking at paintings . Do you consider yourself an artist or a capturer of memories/history.
Good point. Is there any other kind?I consider myself a learning artist.
As an artist, I don't walk around with a camera trying to document a moment. That's what journalists do. There's nothing wrong with that, but it isn't how you create good art. To create good art, you start with the vision, and then try to make that vision a reality. The difference is intention. Are you trying to create what you dream or capture what you found? Are you trying to share what you see or share what you feel? Are you trying to impress or express? A good artistic photo isn't always beautiful, technically proficient, or even recognizable as a photo, but it should always be compelling.
hi jim
not to disagree with you but one can wander around with a camera and document a moment and do it artfully, and create "good art"
( wedding photographers do this all the time ) one doesn't need to capture a dream, &c ...
so much of what people claim is "art photography" or "fine art photography " claims to do these things, the photographer claims to
" have vision" they give "vision workshops" they have fans, but to me, they fall flat.
YMMV
Yup.
I love it when people start talking about "vision". Cracks me up. Everyone does it nowadays. Freakin' home decorators do it. Even soccer mommies planning the 1st grade school play for little Johnny. Blech. In fact it is practically the #1 way to know if someone is full of sh!t.
You want real vision, chew some Peyote*. Now we are talking real vision, not some fake hokey word you use as a fake faker trying to sound creative.
Not aimed at anyone here, just a pet peeve and my 2¢.
*not recommended
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?