Arer these FP4+ results typical?

Barbara

A
Barbara

  • 2
  • 1
  • 93
The nights are dark and empty

A
The nights are dark and empty

  • 11
  • 5
  • 142
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

H
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

  • 0
  • 0
  • 67
Nymphaea

H
Nymphaea

  • 1
  • 0
  • 56

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,931
Messages
2,783,338
Members
99,749
Latest member
gogurtgangster
Recent bookmarks
0

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,043
Format
Multi Format
It is really rare for me to "need" more exposure than box speed.
f/11 vs f/16 is not about deviating from box speed. Just take a known good meter and measure in reflected light a number of sunlit scenes. Especially, but not only, landscapes with foliage.
Simple for me, the OP said so.
Then he knows what he's doing, and no need to show us a digital version of his pictures. You gave better advice in your post #5 of this thread.
 

Jaf-Photo

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
495
Format
Medium Format
The link suddenly worked.

I think the film looks normal. The light is a bit flat due to the overcast conditions.

The light metering has some emphasis on the sky, leading to some under-exposure of the ground. You can do a multi exposure scan to capture more detail and then bring up exposure a bit in post.

But I would say the film worked as it's supposed to.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom