Everyone, after a bit of experience showing their work, should consider a solo show.
Say what?Solo shows are quite difficult to get unless you stage your own vanity show...
I live in a town of 8,500 people
Wrong side of the bed today?Of course.
Wrong side of the bed today?
That explains the paper bag.Always.
That explains the paper bag.
after joining a social film photographers group when I first started getting into darkroom photography, I realised it was more about discussions on equipment, dead photographers and developers...just like here.
I gues it depends on the location. I know several artists and photographers who would give a vital body part to get a solo show at an established/respected gallery or municipal institution. In major markets, most curators and gallerists won't take unsolicited submissions. There is big business in portfolio reviews, basically a pay-to-play system where gallerists, curators, editors and consultants will look at work. Mostly it seems like referrals are the best way to get a foot in the door to be seen and possibly get a (hopefully) solo show or gallery representation.
Same here.
But there are many more accessible alternatives - and this thread is referencing all sorts of options.
Like many places we have "art walks" several times a year where downtown businesses stay open late and host an artist of group of artists. While we have galleries involved, there is quite a range of businesses that do this and some keep the art up after the walk is over: mortgage companies, architectural firms, chamber of commerce type, hair salon, yoga studio, bookstores, a church, a brewery, a distillery, etc.
People discuss their common interests. So cameras, dead photographers, and chemicals are good topics of conversation among hobbyist photographers, who tend to not be interested in each other's photos. (Although, they are often interested in your photos enough to ask about what camera you used, what developer, and what dead photographer you were copying/inspired-by.)
Yes, I find it completely bizarre. It's seems to be a phenomenon mostly by film photographers. Digital photographers seem to be way more keen to show their pictures and discuss composition, lighting, editing etc.
Hate to sound like a downer. I have been on many art walks, gallery openings and open houses. Work does get exposure, very few sales seem to result. Many tend to be more like outdoor/sidewalk art fairs featuring kitschy and amateurish work. At best they are mostly an opportunity for friends and acquaintances to possibly buy one's art. How many times have you gone into a business, be it a bank, café or clothing boutique and really looked (not glanced) at the art on the walls? Offered to buy it? Most of it gets ignored. The upside to a business keeping art on the walls is they might end up buying. The average Joe doesn't buy serious art and from what I've observed collectors don't seem to buy outside their comfort zone. Obviously there are exceptions.
As an aside, I was in a major clothing retail chain store that had some nice art and photography books on display on the shelves among the clothing and accessories. I took one down and was leafing through it and a salesperson politely asked me to put it back, it was part of the decor.
Over my many years I've looked into various cameras clubs and the same two reasons held me back from joining. One, they tend to be a "camera" club and hardware is the topic. Second, if they do talk about images, it is in the context of a competition, usually a "show" with some types of awards for "best of" one thing or another. The competition issue also spills over into the hardware side, with the oneupmanship game over who has the "best" equipment. I have no interest in getting involved in that type of hardware competition as it usually devolves into who has the most money or their own optical bench to prove their lenses are sharper. It's not unlike the audiophile groups where the final word involves the use of an oscilloscope.)This varies greatly.
The much larger group that I became involved with around 2010 loved to talk gear (and digital editing). There was also lots of social interaction and lots of images - including prints - so it was worthwhile for me.
The smaller, film-mostly group I remain involved with mixes the topics nicely.
And the other group that I was involved with until COVID put it into hiatus focused its efforts on images and the techniques and technical aspects relating to sharing work in shows and otherwise.
The most important role of photographic group membership is that it helps one avoid making photography a solitary, purely individual pursuit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?