Whether that should be considered as color negative film suitable for stills is IMO debatable. But it exists.two cinestills
I've never researched this, but I do recall reading somewhere that there were only six color film makers: Kodak, Fuji, Agfa, Ferrania, Konica and Svema. All the others were just rebranded product from these six factories. Is that true?
Not true.
He asked "Are all the other films just rebrands. Is that true?" My answer "Not true."As we'd say over on Stack Exchange: "this answer needs more support to be a good answer."
A clear answer.
He asked "Are all the other films just rebrands. Is that true?" My answer "Not true."
A clear answer.
If all the other brands were not just relabeled, there must have been at least one other manufacturer -- can you provide a more complete list of who made color films during, say, the last couple decades of the 20th century? Since the failures of Agfa, Ferrania, and Svema, it's been pretty clearly just Kodak and Fuji -- or is that wrong too? Who else that I don't know about?
Concerning the current official situation. It is Fuji, Kodak and Inoviscoat
This is a fairly arbitrary list for a very specific time. Ansco/GAF manufactured color film and the old Ilford manufactured colour film. Lucky made color film for a while.I've never researched this, but I do recall reading somewhere that there were only six color film makers: Kodak, Fuji, Agfa, Ferrania, Konica and Svema. All the others were just rebranded product from these six factories. Is that true?
Fujifilm Pro 160NS is also still available, albeit only in Japan, you can buy it on eBay. It is a lovely filmIt's slim pickins right now. The Kodaks, Fuji Pro400H, Cinestill, the Lomo's. That's about all I see.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?