2F/2F
Member
Hello,
I have a Nikon F system circa 1967 and the following Nikkor lenses: 35mm f/2.0, 50mm f/1.4, 135mm f/3.5. All are in near mint to excellent condition, and all are part of the same original kit.
The odd thing is that the 135 lens focuses extremely stiffly, while the 35 is like butter...almost a little too smooth (not really...it is quite luxurious). The 50 feels "normal" to me. In between the other two.
Given that these lenses were probably used extremely rarely (the 135 is dead mint without a single scratch), I am wondering if Nikon designed their teles to focus more stiffly than their shorter lenses. The 135 3.5 is a small lens, so the weight of the glass should not make a difference. I have Canon 200 and 300 that focus more smoothly...but no other experience with Nikon glass.
I highly doubt it, but I was curious. Given that the 135 3.5 is a $50 lens *tops* in any condition, I won't be having it fixed...but I was going to look for another one. However, no point in that if it will be just the same.
I have a Nikon F system circa 1967 and the following Nikkor lenses: 35mm f/2.0, 50mm f/1.4, 135mm f/3.5. All are in near mint to excellent condition, and all are part of the same original kit.
The odd thing is that the 135 lens focuses extremely stiffly, while the 35 is like butter...almost a little too smooth (not really...it is quite luxurious). The 50 feels "normal" to me. In between the other two.
Given that these lenses were probably used extremely rarely (the 135 is dead mint without a single scratch), I am wondering if Nikon designed their teles to focus more stiffly than their shorter lenses. The 135 3.5 is a small lens, so the weight of the glass should not make a difference. I have Canon 200 and 300 that focus more smoothly...but no other experience with Nikon glass.
I highly doubt it, but I was curious. Given that the 135 3.5 is a $50 lens *tops* in any condition, I won't be having it fixed...but I was going to look for another one. However, no point in that if it will be just the same.