If you expose film with an Apochromatic lens, meaning all three colours are almost identically focused, then the resulting enlargement using an Apochromatic lens would also focus all three colours almost identically.
In this scenario, your prints would probably be sharper looking and most likely have slightly higher contrast than those enlarged with your Schneider Componon S.
I've used Apochromatic enlarging lenses, various types, they almost always do make for very pleasing prints. The difference between a Componon S enlarging lens and an Apochromatic enlarging lens is subtle and usually noticeable and can sometimes lift a very good negative just that little bit more.
This is almost a case for ever diminishing returns. A Componon S lens with six elements is a reasonably big step in quality over a 4 element enlarging lens, but the difference between the Apochromatic 45mm wide angle lens and the 50mm Componon S is less; but still there.
If I had the opportunity to obtain a Schneider wide angle Apochromatic enlarging lens, I would grab it.
You will notice fewer problems with larger magnification of the image and it will be a seamless transition from your 50mm Componon S with regard to how the Iris lever works.
From memory, you should be able to do close to 1m wide prints on the long side of a 35mm negative. Providing your enlarger is critically aligned and you are using a glass negative holder, you should be quite amazed at the results. You will need a very good negative and very good darkroom technique though.
Mick.