Yes, that is a typical case of internal reflections. Noticeable on dense part of the frames that are close to the unexposed (unmasked) parts. Usually if the film has relatively clear base the problem is more pronounced.
Some scanners are better than others in that regard. For example, the slower (because of weaker light source and lower sensor gain) original Minolta 5400 is better. You can scan even dense negatives with unexposed part of the negative in the frame with no reflections (shadows) in the image area. Some faster scanners are notorious for reflections and there is no way to scan the part of the rebate of the film especially if you have a dense negative. The problem lies mainly in the sensor cover glass that doesn't have antireflective coatings. Line ccd sensors that you find in scanners are off the shelf components and you can only make a scanner faster (without introducing additional noise) with more light hitting the sensor to get shorter exposure. More light - more reflections/flare. If the light path is dirty the problem is even more evident.
The Nikon Coolscan 8000 that I had drove me nuts because of flare. At the end I decided to remove the sensor cover glass. I tested the removal of the cover glass on a cheap flatbed ccd sensor with great success, but as things go, I then damaged the CS 8000 ccd sensor in the process...
A number of scanners that I had were quite flare resistant, I was most impressed by Microtek 120tf. You could scan negatives with sprocket holes included with very little parasitic light in the surrounding areas. Not as good as a drum scanner, but compared to a CS 8000 it was a LOT better.
Examples of scans with "uncovered" film borders:
(Minolta 5400)
(Canoscan fs4000us)