Dave Wooten said:Darn! Foiled again !12 x 16 is just a bit shy for a 14 x 17 neg.
Harrigan said:I think 1417 is ideal for ulf size and i've always wanted one.
The price isn't too bad but one just sold a couple weeks ago for 2500 with 2 lotus film holders and a lens. i'de take 2 lotus holders over 4 antique ones any day. These antique film holders are certain to leak and they all probably need to be tuned up. The light traps may also be shot you never know until you get them. Anyway if you can burn 10shts of 14x17 in one shoot then you can afford the price for this.
Dave Wooten said:Agreed, (IMH and prejudiced opinion)
You can also shoot 11 x 14- using the 14 x 17 holders and with a mask shoot 2, 7 x 17 s ... this works nice for verticals ....
Harrigan said:Good point on the 7x17 verticals and 11x14. Thanks Dave now I want one even more!
Also on Ebay, it included the bed extension, lens and two Lotus holders. But the selling price actually was $2000. And it's in beautiful condition.Harrigan said:[An Empire State 14x17] just sold a couple weeks ago for 2500 with 2 lotus film holders and a lens.
wfwhitaker said:Also on Ebay, it included the bed extension, lens and two Lotus holders. But the selling price actually was $2000. And it's in beautiful condition.
Don't ask me how I know...
Yes, the 8X20 Folmer in the link is a 7X17. Thank goodness.Terence said:I saw that one. Very nice. I'm assuming it's a 7x17.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?