- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 14,010
- Format
- 8x10 Format
This one time I was ready to exit my elevator at a Hyatt in San Francisco. I had my GW690III with me, hanging at my side. Doors opened and as I try to step out these parents told their kids to run inside. Ignoring the fact that I was trying to get out (and it is just manners to let people out first). Felt a big whack and one kid look dazed. He had run into my GW. I checked my camera, it was fine.
I never learned to focus it accurately at wide apertures. Half of my f/3.5 portraits did not nail the eye.
Not for me.On the positive side, a Hasselblad cures GAS for all other brands. Think of it as a $5K vaccine shot against all analog GAS.
I've never had a chance to get to know any Bronica models, but I'd like a chance to try a GS-1.
I'd like to try one, because it is a 6x7 camera and it is smaller than an RB67 (which does suit me).Same for me, but what makes you think you would like a GS-1 after disliking the 'blad? It seems to me that it's about the same ergonomically, if not a little bit worse in each dimension.
My C330, 645 Pro, Baby Bessa, Kodak Tourist, 6x12 pinhole and Brownie Hawkeye team keep me inoculated from medium format GAS (although I miss my RB67).See? That's exactly what I'm talking about! You are allergic to Hasselblads (the vaccine) and this makes you - in this case - susceptible to Bronica GAS. My body took the vaccine just fine, and I do not feel the urge to try a GS-1, or any other camera from any other manufacturer. I even stopped thinking of large format, so the GAS immunity works across formats!
Kid was not though?
this is a really old post but I didn't want to spam the forum with another similar post. hi, I'm newish here, and I am considering buying a Fuji GF60 but reading all of these posts is making scared. I mainly want to buy it because I had a dream that I was using an Olga Camera and I became famous. (I already purchase it new for $60 on bhphoto) so who knows why I want this Fuji camera, oh well. Please let me know
I could have had a very clean GF670 demo model at a very good price. Handled it. Just didn't feel right, and seemed delicate. Likewise, could have had a very clean M7 at a tempting price. But I opted for a fine "user" GW690ii instead, plus an absolutely mint GW690iii, plus a mint 300 EDIF P67 tele lens, all for basically the same allotted budget. Think I made the right choice. Those fixed-lens Fuji RF's handhold wonderfully if needed, are fairly rugged and simplified, have superb lenses, and didn't cost so much apiece that I have to be paranoid about taking them out into the weather. I really prefer the longer rectangle of 6X9 over 6X7 anyway. And even that wonderful P67 tele does get a lot more usage than I first thought, and is one reason I've kept my whole P67 kit.
If I could afford them all, then I would have em all. But then I'd just go nuts having too many options to worry about, and it might turn out counterproductive. I'm not a camera collector; my concern is the final result; and one adapts to what one has.
I could have had a very clean GF670 demo model at a very good price. Handled it. Just didn't feel right, and seemed delicate. Likewise, could have had a very clean M7 at a tempting price. But I opted for a fine "user" GW690ii instead, plus an absolutely mint GW690iii, plus a mint 300 EDIF P67 tele lens, all for basically the same allotted budget. Think I made the right choice. Those fixed-lens Fuji RF's handhold wonderfully if needed, are fairly rugged and simplified, have superb lenses, and didn't cost so much apiece that I have to be paranoid about taking them out into the weather. I really prefer the longer rectangle of 6X9 over 6X7 anyway. And even that wonderful P67 tele does get a lot more usage than I first thought, and is one reason I've kept my whole P67 kit.
If I could afford them all, then I would have em all. But then I'd just go nuts having too many options to worry about, and it might turn out counterproductive. I'm not a camera collector; my concern is the final result; and one adapts to what one has.
Interesting! I have been eyeing 645 and 6x6 folders which are, in the affordable cases, vintage. I perhaps might be able to get my hands on a Agfa Super Isolette and even lend it for a trip alongside the 6x9 but don't have hopes for outstanding usability and speed.I did a workshop with Mark Steinmetz a few years ago. He mentioned he had been working with a MF folder and gave it up after having focusing problems. He's a Fuji 6x9 RF guy, so if he can't focus a folder, it probably can't be done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?