Anyone using D-23?

Nothing

A
Nothing

  • 1
  • 1
  • 77
Where Did They Go?

A
Where Did They Go?

  • 6
  • 4
  • 194
Red

D
Red

  • 5
  • 3
  • 181
The Big Babinski

A
The Big Babinski

  • 2
  • 6
  • 213

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,038
Messages
2,768,667
Members
99,538
Latest member
Lensgod
Recent bookmarks
0

markbau

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
867
Location
Australia
Format
Analog
Before I mix up a batch and start experimenting with it I would love to hear anyone's experience with this developer. I will be developing HP5 sheet film in BTZS tubes. I have been using D76 1:1.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,400
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
Never used it for HP-5, but I have with other films and it provides very nice negatives. And, it so simple to mix!
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,629
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Ken Lee over at LFPF uses D23 a lot, I think also for HP5+. Google his website; Kenneth Lee gallery d23. You'll find an article on this developer with examples.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,117
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
I have used D23 with Tri-X, FP-4+, HP-5+ and delta 100. I like it a lot - especially for 4x5 sheets in the jobo drum with continuous agitation. I don’t think you’ll see much difference between D23 and D76 though. I’ve gone back to D76 simply because it is less expensive to make.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,117
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
Brad, wouldn't it be the other way round?

No. D-23 has 7.5g Metol per liter and D-76 has only 2g Metol per liter. The Hydroquinone and borax in D-76 is comparatively inexpensive.

Edit: I have not purchased chemicals for about 10~15 years. I recall paying ~$54 per pound for Metol and ~$12 per pound for hydroquinone. Prices may have changed. My cost analysis may be quite incorrect today.
 
Last edited:

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format
No. D-23 has 7.5g Metol per liter and D-76 has only 2g Metol per liter. The Hydroquinone and borax in D-76 is comparatively inexpensive.

Edit: I have not purchased chemicals for about 10~15 years. I recall paying ~$54 per pound for Metol and ~$12 per pound for hydroquinone. Prices may have changed. My cost analysis may be quite incorrect today.
OK, I was just thinking about only having the two ingredients for D-23.
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,871
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
Amongst other films I use it with Fomapan 400 1+1 for 15 minutes with normal agitation and have been quite happy with my results.

Mix it yourself it is always fresh and the formula never changes. (Unless you change it yourself. :D)
 

destroya

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
1,201
Location
Willamette Valley, OR
Format
Multi Format
I use beutler a lot, similar to D23 but with 1 more ingredient. love the results now that Im shooting 4x5. simple to mix, cheap to mix and gives me box speed for foma 100, which no other developer has come close to. I have used D23 and liked it as well. give D23 a try as you mix it yourself, you can mix a small batch up and see if it works for you
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format
I use beutler a lot, similar to D23 but with 1 more ingredient.

IMO, they are quite different. Beutler is a high-def dev and not a fine grain like D-23. Beutler contain sod.carb. and very little sulfite.
Solution A
Water 400ml
Metol 5g
Sodium Sulfite 25g
Water to make 500ml

Solution B
Water 400ml
Sodium Carbonate (Anhd) 25g
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom