Anyone interested in buying some glorious XX 5222 35mm film stock?

rpavich · Jan 9, 2017

Albi Sheridan said:
I love Ilford products. This is an alternative and a better one for most applications.

Thats great...we all have our favorites but that doesn't make Ilford products "second tier"

Albi Sheridan · Jan 9, 2017

darkroommike said:
BTW glorious, sexy Double X isn't nearly as sexy or glorious when it costs more per 100' than anything but Tri-X! The original appeal of movie stock was that you could purchase short ends and recans for 10% of what 35mm still film costs. At parity it is much less appealing.

I prefer it to Tri-X... maybe thats just me. Last I checked Tri-X costs $129 + tax

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/29165-USA/Kodak_1067214_TX_35mm_100_Roll.html

Albi Sheridan · Jan 9, 2017

Marcelo Paniagua said:
Any Idea about cost Albi? Not really that worried about price (film is expensive, period, so I deal with it), just curious.

$80 sound good?

rpavich · Jan 9, 2017

Albi Sheridan said:
$80 sound good?

Is that including shipping?

Albi Sheridan · Jan 9, 2017

rpavich said:
Is that including shipping?

no shipping would be on top of that.

Albi Sheridan · Jan 9, 2017

rpavich said:
Thats great...we all have our favorites but that doesn't make Ilford products "second tier"

Milford is certainly no second tier, agreed.

rpavich · Jan 9, 2017

Albi Sheridan said:
no shipping would be on top of that.

Flat rate or based on location

Albi Sheridan · Jan 9, 2017

rpavich said:
Flat rate or based on location

lowest possible rate based on location. I've no interest in making money with this.

Anyone interested in buying some glorious XX 5222 35mm film stock?

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency