Anybody buying Kodak B&W films nowadays?

Status
Not open for further replies.

baachitraka

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
3,568
Location
Bremen, Germany.
Format
Multi Format
yes, 140 euros is a lot of money. I am with Foma and hope they stay cool with the prices.
 

lamerko

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Messages
759
Location
Bulgaria
Format
Multi Format
Yes, I am buying 400ft rolls of Kodak 5222 - it costs $357 inc VAT (in Europe). That's a 135/36 equivalent of 72-73 rolls at $4.90 each.
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,453
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
Kodak for color where they are about the option nowadays.

I still have film stock bought in 2021-22 where I didn't also shoot much. On the recent price checks, wow what an increase across the board! I know the scope of the topic is BW but I am seeing 80-90-120€ for some Kodak color films around EU stores
I do have some envy at US Kodak prices.

Even then (after 2019) I chose the Deltas over Tmaxes for fine quality and then HP5 as a standard. I finished shooting some TMX I had, replaced by new D100 rolls.

Always bought a bit of foma for more careless (cost wise) shooting in 120. Kentmere seems interesting and has been good in 35mm where I have shot it, together with seemingly rebranded Kentmere stock (APX)

Of course film shooting is a fine vice and art ro be in that I will pay every so often for (color) Kodak. I am also rather selective and shooting medium format so the consumption is low, good films (Ilford) are worth it.
 

albireo

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,433
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I mean - 14€/14$ for Trix or Tmax iso 400... double to cost of Ilford, and triple the cost of Foma.
As much as I want to buy and support them - I just cannot give 140€ for a box of 10 films.

I shot my last roll of TriX in 120 in 2019, then stopped. I'm happy with Ilford, Kentmere and Foma for the type of amateur-level work I do. Occasionally, I will treat myself to a brick of Gold 200 or Ektar 100 which is of course extraordinary stuff, but as far as black and white is concerned I have happily moved on from my Kodak days.
 
Last edited:

Tel

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
977
Location
New Jersey
Format
Multi Format
I'm happy shooting HP5 and 5222. Used to shoot whole bricks os Tri-X but it's been a long while since I bought any.
 
OP
OP

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
Yes, I am buying 400ft rolls of Kodak 5222 - it costs $357 inc VAT (in Europe). That's a 135/36 equivalent of 72-73 rolls at $4.90 each.

Where do you buy it? I have seen one ebay listing, but for expired roll. I would be happy with Eastman XX.
 

lamerko

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Messages
759
Location
Bulgaria
Format
Multi Format
Where do you buy it? I have seen one ebay listing, but for expired roll. I would be happy with Eastman XX.

I buy from Frame24 - the prices are very good. The Kodak 5222 is currently out of stock, but they are stocking it in a week or two. I'm guessing it will be available in a few days. They are in the UK - I order to a UK address, you can contact them for shipping and taxes. The prices on the site are without VAT, it is charged when ordering.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,567
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I stopped buying Tmax 8x10 when it went over $4 per sheet. I think this was around 2008. Too bad because I think it was the best 8x10 BW film ever made.
I stopped buying Kodak 100ft rolls when it went over $100 in 2014.
.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,567
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I stopped buying Kodak 8mm film when they stopped supplying it to film makers in 2012:

 

Saganich

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
1,279
Location
Brooklyn
Format
35mm RF
Yes, I am buying 400ft rolls of Kodak 5222 - it costs $357 inc VAT (in Europe). That's a 135/36 equivalent of 72-73 rolls at $4.90 each.

Same in NYC
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,865
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
They'd probably sell more 400 foot rolls if you could just order it online. Needing to call gives you just enough time and inconvenience to change your mind.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,504
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
I'm still buying Kodak. Here in Western Canada a roll of 120 is 1.8 x the cost of HP5. I still have a good fridge full of film. I mostly order film & paper from B&H....& their prices on 120 Kodak and Ilford are very close. HP5 is $8.50 a roll and TMax 400 is $8.80 USD.
 

juan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
2,707
Location
St. Simons I
Format
Multi Format
I shot Tri-X from the time I could buy a 24-exposure roll for 72-cents at Kmart. My last Kodak film was some of the 120 with the backing paper issues. Fuji X-ray film works fine for me in large format. I'm trying Kentmere in small formats.
 

George Collier

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
1,363
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Multi Format
At this point for me (been shooting since the late 50's, when Trix was rated at 200 ASA) I do a lot of image editing before shooting, now mostly with 35mm. By editing, I mean I just am much more selective about what I shoot, trying to process 3 rolls per month.
These are Trix and FP4, both in Rodinal. I never did like Plusx, but Trix was my film for life for many decades, in various developers at different times, but with Rodinal always in the darkroom. I'm disappointed to find that the Trix and Rodinal combo no longer yields the sturdy, beefy grain of the 70's, probably both have changed. I've been feeding rolls of HP5, in Rodinal, into the mix and like it a lot, and am considering dropping Trix, but can't make the move, I suppose for sentimental reasons. I started using Ilford films in the early 2000's, just because I didn't know when Kodak would close their doors.
The cost difference doesn't bother me for the amount I shoot - I guess I'll use both Trix and HP5 until I see no reason to use Trix.
 
OP
OP

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format

This Brexit! Now I need to add custom cost to this :/
 

logan2z

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
3,729
Location
SF Bay Area, USA
Format
Multi Format
I've completely switched over to Ilford FP4 and HP5. I've got a few rolls of Tri-X 120 in the fridge but won't be buying any more.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
I changed completely to Ilford when Kodak priced themselves out of 4x5. I could afford to shoot Kodak in 35mm and 120. It costs more but not as drastically more as it does in Europe. But their sheet film prices are just crazy and I like to standardize across formats. Ilford makes excellent products anyway. A bit different, but I don't feel like I'm giving up anything at all.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,659
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
XX 5222 400 feet - $4.20 a roll
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,752
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
When shooting MF and 35mm I buy Tmax 400 and few rolls of Tmax 100 when traveling. When shooting locally and I am not concerned about film speed as much I shoot Foma 400 at 320 or 200 depending on the camera and light meter. 4X5 Foma 400.
 

Alex Benjamin

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
2,575
Location
Montreal
Format
Multi Format
No, just color. Can't afford both Ektar and Tri-X. All my B&W are Ilford.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,504
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
When shooting MF and 35mm I buy Tmax 400 and few rolls of Tmax 100 when traveling. When shooting locally and I am not concerned about film speed as much I shoot Foma 400 at 320 or 200 depending on the camera and light meter. 4X5 Foma 400.

Me too re Kodak.... especially if i've paid $1k+ for an airline ticket and am printing on 16x20 FB paper @ $450 USD for warmtone!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…