No Magicflex experience. I will point you to this Chinese company screen; I assume it will show up on UK ebay or be obtainable-
Bright Focusing Screen f/ Rolleiflex 2.8F 2.8E2 3.5F 3.5T ROLLEICORD VB 64*68mm | eBay
Suitable for Rolleiflex 2.8F,3.5F,3.5T,3.5E2,3.5E3,2.8E2 ROLLEICORD VB. It is Focusing Screen, Ultra bright. Pls Note: This is All-in-one screen,no need ground glass.Transmittance higher,more even edges.www.ebay.com
I have used a couple of them, testing them out. Perfectly usable. Bright, even illumination. And no center spot, etc. For the price, you might give one a try.
Grid lines- depends on your ability to determine angles in an image. Guide lines are nice but also distracting. You can take a screen and set it up on a guide to draw your own lines if you miss them. Put them on the down side, the plain ground side, not on the fresnel side.
Split image center circle: A problem with a TLR, more so than with a camera held at eye level, is the reframing that happens after you move the camera to put the focus aid on the subject. With an eye level camera, the reframing is very slight adjustment of angle. With a TLR, floating away from your body, it is easier to sway, move the whole body, shoulders, etc. to reframe. And in doing this, focus can be thrown off. This depends on what you are shooting and how close they are. I like plain screens because I can both frame and focus at the same time; location on the screen isn't critical to checking focus, and less chance of losing focus with reframing. It's more like a view camera where you aren't going to be swinging the camera on a tripod head to center a subject and then reframe; you rough out the shot and focus wherever the subject falls on the screen.
OK, this is very personal. And I use focus aid screens also without problems.
Came to say that Alex from Magicflex camera actually buys this exact screen from this exact seller, only to re-sell the same screen 7 times the price
Interesting.
I have a couple of Magicflex screens to be installed in the next few weeks. I am planning to compare them to the ones I bought.
He has been called out on it a few times, he says that he does "more work" to them to make them better, I don't buy that.
Interesting.
I have a couple of Magicflex screens to be installed in the next few weeks. I am planning to compare them to the ones I bought.
Interesting.
I have a couple of Magicflex screens to be installed in the next few weeks. I am planning to compare them to the ones I bought.
OK, a brief impression. Both the Magicflex and Chinese screens have a mottle pattern to them. Very similar, I wouldn't say that the Magicflex was different. Similar pattern, etc. A series of small black dots all over the screen. This is sort of like the frosted glass in bathroom windows? It serves as a bit of a focus aid- the mottling gets more blobby the further out of focus the area is. The screens have a nice snap. All in all the mottling and black dots are bit off-putting. Sure, a Maxwell is nicer. A Mamiya is nicer. An Oleson is nicer. You spends your money, you makes your choices.
Bad image, hard to photograph this kind of thing. And the fall-off to the edges is from the camera lens, not in real life. Pretty even illumination across the screen.
I own a Rolleicord that was overhauled by Magicflex. The screen is the best I’ve used in a TLR, but I haven’t had the chance to use the Maxwell screen. It is very bright and very easy to accurately focus.
Overall, this overhauled Rolleicord is the nicest Rollei I’ve owned - it works perfectly, and looks practically new.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?