Didn't realize that you were considering taking a job.if I suggest two enlargers they will probably expect twice as much output!
I'm told that when it gets busy 100 prints a day is the norm which is about 4.2 minutes a print for 7 hours printing. Currently I'm nowhere near that speed.
How long did it take you to get upto that speed?
What do you think? Should I tell them they need to adjust exposure and development to give a softer and easier to print neg which is likely to require much less use of fill flash. I know they won't like that because thats the way they have always done it and I think trying to explain about development contrast will go over their head.
well I have started the job. Its temporary for just the summer season. It's a small company doing mostly beach shots of families, children and babies with an occasional commission at someones house or christening etc. The selling point is traditionally printed silver gelatin prints which are all on RC paper. Cheap Kentmere VC Select which requires only small amount of filtration change for big change in contrast.
They have set their dev time of acros 100 so that zone VIII gives film density of 1.57 i.e. very contrasty negs. To compound the problem, they use fill flash on nearly all shots and because of mostly bright sunlight on hair, virtually all shots need burning in on top of head or side of face unless I kill the contrast of the print which makes them look lifeless. And to compound things further, they like all the children images to be printed with skin tones up around print value VII or VIII. i.e. they have a set look for the images which is often at odds with a heavily sun tanned subject. Oh, and they want 100 negs done a day in 7 hours. Currently my output is approx 20-25.
enalrger is crap. Its a leitz focomat V35 and when you change aperture it rotates focus which means you can't open up to focus because when you close down you will screw focus. A real PITA. The autofocus is bust. There's no filter holder available under the lens for flashing although thats a minor concern. There's no lightbox in the darkroom and I had to ask for a loupe in the darkroom. Get the picture?
So I have some saying a print every 4 mins is reasonable and others saying 20-25 a day is reasonable. I will be surprised if I manage to double my output and I have told them their expectations are unreasonable.
What do you think? Should I tell them they need to adjust exposure and development to give a softer and easier to print neg which is likely to require much less use of fill flash. I know they won't like that because thats the way they have always done it and I think trying to explain about development contrast will go over their head.
And number one rule is that I make the little darlings look wonderful!
As for practical suggestions, the first thing I'd do is get a piece of translucent perspex, a white styrofoam cup, drafting vellum, or something to diffuse the light from the enlarger for flashing. Flash with the negative still in the carrier and the diffusing material below the lens so that it affects all light coming out of the lens, and work out a flashing time as a percentage of the main exposure. I found this worked well for bringing the highlights back down with contrasty negatives, and you don't have to mess with removing the negative or setting up a separate flashing station. A flash of 20% of the printing exposure worked consistently well for me
Just curious if you know what density your piece of perspex was.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?