• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Any advice for new Rondinax user?


I understand what it is. I was just confused as to what you meant by "use it," since in normal operation that meter is operated automatically by the film passing through the funnel.

I just cut off the film when it's all the way pulled out of the cartridge. The meter just serves as a nice confirmation that nothing has gone wrong with the process. To be sure, this has already resulted in me developing the exposed tail end of the film when I developed a roll of self-loaded bulk film, but I already did that all the time with my inversion tanks and I don't think it noticeably affects the life of my developer.
 
I'm guessing that the indicator that AgX refers to is actually there to permit users to develop portions of a roll, while leaving the rest of the roll for either later exposure or later (and different) development.
Perfect for the real estate listing photographer!
 
Exactly, Matt.
Seemingly I was not clear enough about in my post.
As said such can be done in a darkroom, but this device allows to do so in daylight.


But as the indicator is not very precise, and if it was there still would bre the issue of the leader length, I wonder, and asked above, if anyone uses this feature.
 
Another aspect: cleaning

Just this moment I am busy cleaning the two Rondinaxes. As I got them from a school lab, there was a lot of Calciumcarbonate residue all over. Both, getting this off and in first place drying the devices (especially the 35mm version) is a hassle, due to the complex design.

Of course, one could just not bother and keep the carbonate building up...

Or rinse them after use Calcium-free.
 
So not to resurrect a dead thread, but I finally used my Rondinax a second time, on a roll of what should have been properly-exposed Foma 200. I used d-76 and the partial-submersion/continuous agitation method (7 oz of liquid in each bath, one half turn every two seconds).

One of youse guys said it would be a shorter development time due to the constant agitation, so I It wasn't a good roll so I just tried developing for about the recommended time to see how badly overdeveloped that would make it.

I developed for six minutes, than fixed for four in acid fix. At the end of it, I came out with a completely blocked negative, with dense opaque images. I know the fixer was good because I fixed two dry plates in it for three minutes yesterday--they both cleared almost instantly.

Should I have developed for a lot less time? Have I somehow killed my fixer? Was it wrong to twist in half turns?
 
How fast were you rotating the device, It is a very slow motion. Have you seen the Youtube on Rondinax use? The guy seems to know. I don't think development time is much shorter then standard. Rotation consistency is critical.
 
Witold said:
How fast were you rotating the device, It is a very slow motion.
Click to expand...
As said, Agfa specified the the kind of agitation, but of course anyone can do his own thing.
 
AgX said:
As said, Agfa specified the the kind of agitation, but of course anyone can do his own thing.
Click to expand...
I have never used Rondinax, I was merely referring to Youtube video where the guy seems to know and was happy with results.
 
Witold said:
How fast were you rotating the device, It is a very slow motion. Have you seen the Youtube on Rondinax use? The guy seems to know. I don't think development time is much shorter then standard. Rotation consistency is critical.
Click to expand...
As I said, half turn every two seconds. Turns out that's way too much; people are saying it's like a tiny little jerk on the wheel every two seconds for a total rotation of about 1/2 RPM.
 
Obviously, you need to make at least one full turn immediately after pouring in the developer (I'd probably crank continuously for at least 30-60 seconds), so the emulsion gets coated and can start to soak the liquid into the gelatin. Beyond that, if you're turning continuously, you probably need to use the "rotary" processing times instead of the usual inversion process times -- and if you're not, I'd think there's a hazard of uneven development, as some of the film is standing in the liquid and some is developing only with the film and soak-in developer, up in the air.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register