Another 'what happened to these negatives?' thread

logan2z said:

I thought I'd post another follow-up now that I've scanned my latest set of negatives.

I'm happy to report that I don't see any streaking on any of the 38 frames I managed to squeeze out of my latest roll of Tri-X.

I followed the same dilution of HC-110 (H), development time (9 minutes) and initial agitation (continuous for the first 30 seconds, 4 inversions in 5 seconds at the start of each subsequent 30 seconds) that I followed on my last successful roll. It looks like this might just be a successful formula for me.

I've got another test roll that I shot a few weeks ago that I'll develop next and, if that goes well, then I'll start to work my way through my backlog, which also includes a bunch of 120 film that I've yet to try developing. Hoping that things continue to go well.

Thanks to those who have been following this thread closely and have offered up their expertise. The amount of knowledge and experience on this forum is mind-boggling and newcomers to home development like myself are lucky that you're all willing to share it.

I'll post back with another update once I get a few more rolls under my belt.

Click to expand...

pentaxuser said:

Well there is a thread by Alfredo Dorrichi quite close this one in which he uses HC110 on a kind of minimalist semi-stand process. Most if not all semi-stand faithfully use the one minute continuous agitation at the start and it seems to produce good results

So it may be worth trying this regime. Have a look at his pictures if you haven't done so already

pentaxuser

Click to expand...

logan2z said:

I thought I'd post another follow-up now that I've scanned my latest set of negatives.

I'm happy to report that I don't see any streaking on any of the 38 frames I managed to squeeze out of my latest roll of Tri-X.

I followed the same dilution of HC-110 (H), development time (9 minutes) and initial agitation (continuous for the first 30 seconds, 4 inversions in 5 seconds at the start of each subsequent 30 seconds) that I followed on my last successful roll. It looks like this might just be a successful formula for me.

I've got another test roll that I shot a few weeks ago that I'll develop next and, if that goes well, then I'll start to work my way through my backlog, which also includes a bunch of 120 film that I've yet to try developing. Hoping that things continue to go well.

Thanks to those who have been following this thread closely and have offered up their expertise. The amount of knowledge and experience on this forum is mind-boggling and newcomers to home development like myself are lucky that you're all willing to share it.

I'll post back with another update once I get a few more rolls under my belt.

Click to expand...

Sirius Glass said:

Great news!
View attachment 307029

Click to expand...

Vania said:

What do you shoot for your test ? I fill the frame with a gray card that I overexpose by 1 or 2 stops to get the density when the steaks are more apparent. I find that as they are not in every frame it is hard to be sure otherwise.

Click to expand...

snusmumriken said:

I’m just catching up on this thread after a spell away. Really pleased that you think you may have cracked the problem.

But I'm really puzzled by the photos you showed in post #158. You seem to have streaks running vertically in some frames and horizontally in others. Is that right?

Click to expand...

Craig said:

If you have streaks in two different directions on the same roll, it's probably not an artifact from processing. Internal flare in the camera/lens?

Click to expand...