It's also important to note that spare batteries are currently not in the budget
there are plenty of film cameras that take aa or cr123 or "other" batteries ..
not really sure what the point of this thread is ...
That's right, Master J..my Nikon F6 is just as dead as a brand spanking new D3X, without CR123s...but thank goodness the old M3 keeps on going..and going..and going
A digital fan would say digital is superior because you cannot remain without film. If you want to shoot analogue, you have to carry film and maybe batteries. If you want to shoot digital, you have to carry batteries and memory cards. You seem to be a little biased toward film
(I imagine you disposed of your batteries properly rather than throwing them into the trash)
While when I go shoot with my mom who has a DLSR she is constantly having to charge her battery before shooting, or if spur of the moment, can't get the shot because her battery suddenly dies. I see the advantage!
Maybe mom needs to replace the battery or buy a spare.
I don't think that dependence on batteries is a strong argument for film and against digital.
Must be a pretty tight budget if it can't accommodate a few AA batteries. They're a lot cheaper than film.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?