http://macodirect.de/rollei-redbird-13536br20-filme-p-1625.html?language=enTranslate SUC please. Are you saying this is similar to Ilford's pseudo-IR film? SFX I think it's called?
Redbird is the name given to a technique of shooting photographic film where the film is exposed from the wrong side, i.e the emulsion is exposed through the base of the film. The name "redscale/redbird" comes because there is a strong color shift to red due to the red-sensitive layer of the film being exposed first, rather than last (the red layer is normally the bottom layer in C-41
Translate SUC please. Are you saying this is similar to Ilford's pseudo-IR film? SFX I think it's called?
The way I see it...
Whatever it takes to keep the respective coating and finishing lines profitable is fine by me.
That's quite a high growth.Yes, I think we should look at it this way.
Besides, more options, more alternatives mean the photographic medium film in general will be more attractive. And probably these "experimental films" are attractive to quite a lot of digital photographers as well. And by going this route these photographers are discovering or re-discovering film (again).
We see this trend with Low-Fidelity and Lomo photography. This market segment has growth rates of 50 % p.a.. Much more than any digital segment. And this market segment is film based.
Jana
The way I see it...
Whatever it takes to keep the respective coating and finishing lines profitable is fine by me.
A means to end.
That's quite a high growth.
The problem of LOMOs is that it's a trend. What will happen when it gets out of fashion?
It is not a trend. Lomography started already in the beginning of the nineties. It is an established concept for years.
We have to look at a much more widespread photographic area. I think the best name is Low-Fidelity Photography. And it is much more than Lomography, e.g. pinhole photography or photos with classic box cameras or simple folders belong to that segment, too.
Low-Fidelity Photography is established as a different way to see and to photograph. I think it is an art form of its own.
Jana
It is not a trend. Lomography started already in the beginning of the nineties. It is an established concept for years.
We have to look at a much more widespread photographic area. I think the best name is Low-Fidelity Photography. And it is much more than Lomography, e.g. pinhole photography or photos with classic box cameras or simple folders belong to that segment, too.
Low-Fidelity Photography is established as a different way to see and to photograph. I think it is an art form of its own.
Jana
It's a trend. In 10 years the userbase will be half to a quarter of what it is, guaranteed. Almost in society these days is a trend.
Not to change the subject, but speaking of IR films, are there any color ones still being made or are they all black and white?
I don't understand what the problem is even if it is a trend. You are dealing with a generation that was born with digital. These kinds of film, along with things that have been around forever, like crossprocessing, are bringing these people back to film. Why hate it, you should be embracing it! They don't know what film is except what "daddy used to use". I work at a lab and sometimes if it weren't for the xprocess, my machine wouldn't run that day. Do you know that in the last two weeks I have had three different Non-Customers come in asking how to load their new camera? Two Mamiya 645's and a Mamiya C330, new to them, I step up and promote whatever they do. Why? Because they are helping whether you want to believe it or not. They are buying film. And they all get tired of gimmicks like everyone else, except now they have a great camera in their hands and a need to shoot "What they see" i.e. professional films and furthermore B&W they can process themselves. Digging a deeper hole and I am proud to help because all in all it's keeping it alive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?