• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Another Diafine question

Mackenzies Pocket

A
Mackenzies Pocket

  • 1
  • 0
  • 12
Flush

H
Flush

  • 2
  • 0
  • 18

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,910
Messages
2,847,422
Members
101,529
Latest member
Abjayan
Recent bookmarks
0

philipus

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
218
Location
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Format
Analog
Hello everyone

I received very helpful advice in (there was a url link here which no longer exists) about the storage of Diafine and now have a follow-up regarding the use of Diafine.

I am aware that Diafine is useful for pushing but would I risk the photos if I were to develop a film shot at a lower EI/ISO?

I am thinking specifically of Double-X/5222 which I use a lot. I currently have a few rolls shot at about EI200 but I am not sure what to expect if I soup them in Diafine - will they be poorly developed?

In case it is relevant, I scan my film (though am in the process of learning to print too so I don't want to develop them in a way that prevents printing them later).

Thank you very much in advance
Philip
 
I don't foresee any trouble. I did some unscientific tests with TRI-x exposed from ISA 100 to 1600 and developped with Diafine and negatives were pretty good whatever the speed used.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I usually rate 5222 at an EI of 400 and develop it in Hc-110 with excellent results. Diafine is something else. There is usually some increase in speed and some wishful thinking as I have found negatives a bit thin for my liking. Results with Diafine are somewhat film specific. Remember too that 5222 was designed as a cine negative film with a specific developer D-96 in mind. So while I would not anticipate any problems it would be good to run some tests first.
 
I just developed some HP5+ shot at box speed, that is @ISO 400, and is beautiful.
 
Hi, Phillip!
I've used a lot of Diafine and have found that it is very forgiving about speed, especially if you don't mind rather flat negatives for scanning. I tend to regard the official list of film speeds in Diafine as maximums, and expose at slower speeds in most cases. Nowadays I use Diafine either because I need the speed or the convenience. The only film I would actually choose to develop in Diafine is Plus-X, which is absolutely magical at 400 in Diafine. Other films work OK, but probably can look better in other developers. I've not used Double-X, so I can only speculate based on the above. In general, I find cutting EI to 2/3 of the official Diafine value is safe and often beneficial.

Chris
 
Hello everybody, thanks very much for the further replies, I am very grateful.

I feel much more confident now. I had initially intended Diafine as a developer for push processing, which I do quite a bit using HC-110. I've tested Double-X and find that I can get good results to EI800, 1000 in a pinch, but that will become a bit grainy. So I was interested in using Diafine for this purpose. But then it began to intrigue me, due to the simplicity and also because of the supposedly flatter negs which I like for scanning.

I realise there could well be trade-offs and that other developers will give better results, but it's worth a shot. I will bathe one film as a test at EI 200 and see how it turns out.

best
Philip
 
Hi, Phillip!
I've used a lot of Diafine and have found that it is very forgiving about speed, especially if you don't mind rather flat negatives for scanning. I tend to regard the official list of film speeds in Diafine as maximums, and expose at slower speeds in most cases. Nowadays I use Diafine either because I need the speed or the convenience. The only film I would actually choose to develop in Diafine is Plus-X, which is absolutely magical at 400 in Diafine. Other films work OK, but probably can look better in other developers. I've not used Double-X, so I can only speculate based on the above. In general, I find cutting EI to 2/3 of the official Diafine value is safe and often beneficial.

Chris

Do you think Plus-X is more magic in Diafine than 1:1 in XTOL @ISO64? And have you then also tested Ilford FP4 @400 in Diafine? I have tested FP4 @250 in Diafine and think its pretty nice.

www.tmax100.com
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom