Another Aristo V54/VC question

Self portrait.

A
Self portrait.

  • 3
  • 1
  • 68
There there

A
There there

  • 4
  • 0
  • 81
Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 7
  • 0
  • 174

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,973
Messages
2,783,940
Members
99,760
Latest member
Sandcake
Recent bookmarks
0

ronlamarsh

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2004
Messages
461
Location
Seattle Wash
Format
Multi Format
I went through most of the other threads on this but didn't find anything pertaining to my question. I have an Aristo cold lite(V54) and am using Freestyle edu ultra VC paper(FOMA). I seem to have the opposite issue of most of the folks on other threads: my tests with both the cold lite and on my B&J Solar(tungsten diffusion) show a definite softness with the edu ultra VC. So much so I question my negative development times. I tested a negative at normal dev with Slavich graded(#3) and it is about what I would expect..highlighs need some burning and maybe use a soft developer. With the VC(edu ultra) I need to use a a #4 filter for about the same effect. Any one else had this soft experience? I can develope a highlight zone 8 to a density of about 1.6 and still print it as Z8 with a #3 filter?
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,673
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
I have to use a higher contrast setting on my VCL 4500. Normal for me ranges between grade 3 and 4. If I have a very flat negative to print I on occasion will have to do part of the exposure with only the blue tube. But that is rare. I almost always get what I need out of grade 3.something. I almost never print with it set as low as grade 2.
 

KOG

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2006
Messages
50
Location
DFW - TX
Format
Multi Format
it is not uncommon for paper grades to vary from manufacturer to manufacturer.

I've projection printed a step wedge onto Arista.edu Ultra RC VC glossy, and the contrast is very close to grade 3. It was about the same as Ilford Multigrade RC using the same setup - Aristo D2 V54 lamp with a Ilford Multigrade #3 filter.

Kevin.
 

George Collier

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
1,363
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Multi Format
My experience is opposite - I need to use lower contrast filters - my normal range is 1 - 1.5 filter. This gives me a rough equivalent to the old Seagull grade 2, using negatives from years ago.
Also, the contrast steps between filters are not linear (nor are exposures between filters consistent), so when split grade printing, I do a lot of testing. It's worth it, though.
I have the V54 lamp with the filter drawers and most of what I have printed with it over the last 5 - 6 years has been on Forte Fiber and Ilford MG4 fiber.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
1,355
Location
Downers Grov
Fresh paper and developer are one key.

Then develope the negative to give a nice full tone on #2 paper from a nice full tone subject.

Remember exposure controls the shadow density in the neg, development controls the density of the highlights and the contrast in the print.
 

jmcd

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
710
Slavich graded(#3)

I love Slavich, but grade 3 Slavich has extreme contrast compared to Ilford, and high contrast by at least a grade to Kentmere.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom