• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

An ode to the utilitarian charme of Mamiya's TLR and 6x4.5/6x7 SLR cameras

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,628
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Lets discuss camera aethestics!!

While the late-model rangefinders and 645s having a bit of a 1990s camcorder vibe to it, the utilitarian charme of the C3, C33 and C330, the early 645a and of course the chunky RZ is reminding me of a 1970s Ford Bronco, "hardware stores", plaid shirts and some cold Long Island winds. Melville's "Gold Coast" springs to mind.

Owners and collectors, please post your treasures!
 
Last edited:

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
27,433
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
As far as I'm concerned, this is bunching together cameras that have more differences than similarities between them.

There's the 645 family
Then there's the entirely different RZ stuff
Which is totally different from the 6's and 7's RF's
Again entirely different from the TLR's

The analogies with old cars etc. are beyond me. I guess I'm not much of a connoisseur. Does it work? Does it have a decent lens? Is it practically usable? That's what interests me. My 645 ticks some of the boxes, not all. It sees little use. On the rare occasions I shoot MF, I pick the Bronica 6x6 over the 645 9 times out of 10.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,628
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
It is about their "utilitarian charme" (esp. the brushed metal parts, leatherette, etc.) vis a vis the smooth 1990s plastic of the late rangefinders and 645 with their Contax siblings.
 
Last edited:

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,544
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
My RB67 has something none of my other cameras have: extreme versatility. It mounts 2x3 Graflok backs, so I can put Grafmatics and Graflex 22, 23, RH-something backs on it. And I can run 35 mm film in the 220 back, plus I have a Mamiya 645 back. I have lenses from effective 28 mm to 180 and there are longer ones I haven't got (yet) -- and with a 2x teleconverter, I can cover some range of focal lengths.

And as mentioned, it's built like a truck.
 

ags2mikon

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
740
Location
New Mexico
Format
Multi Format
As Donald just stated the RB67 is extremely versatile. I use the backs with my Horseman cameras, Graflex XL cameras and my Mamiya press G type cameras. It has great lenses and is reliable.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,628
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Yeah, this thread is not for specs. It is about the special aesthetic of 1970s Mamiyas. Not to discuss features of the cameras I mentioned. Hope its clear.
 
Last edited:

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
10,146
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Mamiya Press, good selection of lens, the Universal Multi Back allowed for 6X4.5, 6X6 or 6X9, with ground glass back and extension unit could be used for close ups, or used with 6X9 sheet film. Designed to used hand held. The Cs, I know folks rave about Rolli lens, but the TLR lens were top of the line, the 80mm was 2.8 and unless shooting with very high resolution film was as sharp as needed. Built in bellows, interchangeable finders, although the Konica Omgea Flex had interchangeable backs was almost impossible to use in landscape mode.
 

GregY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
4,052
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format

Nicely stated.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,628
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Yes good point, the "Press" series also have that aura.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,425
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
RezaLoghme said:
Yeah, this thread is not for specs. It is about the special aesthetic of 1970s Mamiyas. Not to discuss features of the cameras I mentioned. Hope its clear.
Click to expand...

As far as I'm concerned, the "special aesthetic" of the 1970s Mamiyas resides mainly in the fact that when I started using them I was in my late teens or early 20s.
Family portrait taken by me (with the aid of a mechanical self timer) using, probably, my C330.
I'm in the white turtleneck at the front - doesn't the hair suit that Mamiya aesthetic ?
 

David Brown

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
4,060
Location
Earth
Format
Multi Format
I have an RB67 (not RZ), a C220 TLR, and a 645. All have their appeal. But to turn the OP's analogy sideways: It's like having an F-150, a Mustang, and a Galaxy 500. All Ford, all useful, but nothing alike.
 

flavio81

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,241
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format

I owned Mamiya C2, C220, C330, almost all TLR lenses, the custom Mamiya Aluminium case,
several RB67 pro-S bodies, with 50, 65, 90, 127, 180 lenses...

Today it is "bye bye Mamiya, hello Bronica and Pentax"

Don't get me wrong, the RB67 is close to a perfect machine, except for the size and weight. The Pentax 67 is smaller and lighter (yet doesn't do everything that the RB can do), the Bronica ETRS is very small and light and does most of what the RB can do, albeit on a smaller format.

The Mamiya lenses for the RB are very good.

For the car analogy, i'd say the Mamiya RB67 is a Mercedes Unimog. Slow, big, heavy, but reliable and can get you anywhere, no terrain stops it.

 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
3,209
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

Right there with you.

I have owned the original 645 500J and almost all the Cs with a variety of lenses.

They are a study in understated elegance, reliability, and utility.

They are now all long gone, replaced by something newer, but if I ever bought another one, it would be the C2 which is the best bang for the buck TLR ever made IMHO, especially when fitted with the more modern glass.
 

Don_ih

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,652
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
The lot of them are chunky and not very pretty.

Is that good enough?

There are extra capabilities of the Mamiya TLRs that I don't use, so I don't appreciate the extra size. In fact, mine has been unused for about 5 years.

The RB67 is about as handsome as an excavator. So, if you like excavators...

Mamiya 35mm cameras range from brutally ugly to banal.

The Mamiya Press is second only to the Koni Omega in terms of unwieldiness.

By all means, buy every one of them. They take average to good photos.
 

flavio81

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,241
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format

IMO, in terms of ugliness from most pretty to YUCK:

1. Mamiya RZ67
2. Mamiya NC1000 (in black)
3. Mamiyaflex C2
4. Mamiya C330S and C330F
5. Mamiya C220F
6. Mamiya RB67
7. Mamiya C220
8. Mamiya Press original model
9. Mamiya Universal (black)
10. Mamiya Super 23

However no Mamiya is as ugly as a Koni-Omega Rapid.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,425
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Beauty is as Beauty does.
Results from my Koni-Omega, before I reluctantly accepted the fact that its ergonomics were just not meant for mostly one-handed, left handed me, and I sold it on.


I actually like/liked the way they look though.
 

Don_ih

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,652
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
I like that, if I get bored, I can release the bellows catches on my Mamiya 23 and pretend it's an accordion.

flavio81 said:
Mamiya NC1000
Click to expand...

I actually really like that camera. But the lenses, while they are great for photos, tend to easily stop working. Summer heat caused two of mine to liquefy lubricants and gum up the aperture.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,544
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
RB67 is heavy and, as others have noted, looks like a truck, but it does good work.



35 mm Gold 200 in a 220 back. 90 mm f/3.9 Sekor-C.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,628
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
If I were banned from owning Leica products, and HAD to choose a Mamiya, it would be...hm...an early 645 because of its size, or a C330.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,544
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Nah, that's the point where I bought my RB67. And more recently (late-life crisis?) a Minox B. But both were cameras I'd wanted since my teens...
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
4,137
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I used a Koni for weddings before I went to a Hasselblad and it worked very well for that. Even some scenery shots I used it for came out extremely sharp with the 90mm Hex lens. I had the 58mm and 180mm also and could not fault them in anyway whatsoever. Matt, your shot above has that signature.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register