rpavich
Member
I think I've observed something about exposing color film vs B&W when it comes to darkroom printing.
It appears to me that when exposing color neg film with the intent to print in the darkroom the exposure really plays a big part of how things come out. If the shot is underexposed, then to get the correct looking print, you are forced print it so that the max black cannot be obtained. The results really do look much better if the exposure is correct in the first place. I realize that B&W is the same and I'm not saying that you can do whatever you want with black and white, but not being able to add contrast to try and make the blacks look better when making the print lighter really exposes my shooting faults.
I made a contact sheet where I exposed for just barely getting black on the rebate portion of the film and sure enough, the frames that were correctly exposed look a LOT better when printed than the frames that I had to monkey with during printing because they deviated from that.
Just my observation from the short time I've been printing color.
It appears to me that when exposing color neg film with the intent to print in the darkroom the exposure really plays a big part of how things come out. If the shot is underexposed, then to get the correct looking print, you are forced print it so that the max black cannot be obtained. The results really do look much better if the exposure is correct in the first place. I realize that B&W is the same and I'm not saying that you can do whatever you want with black and white, but not being able to add contrast to try and make the blacks look better when making the print lighter really exposes my shooting faults.
I made a contact sheet where I exposed for just barely getting black on the rebate portion of the film and sure enough, the frames that were correctly exposed look a LOT better when printed than the frames that I had to monkey with during printing because they deviated from that.
Just my observation from the short time I've been printing color.