Not true. A second or subsequent identity is easily arranged. The legal (given) name and address of the individual is the only valid identification. I have not provided anything other than my experience with this individual. That is a matter of record since I was a party to the action. If that had not been a party to the action than that would have comprised hearsay and been subject to legal action. However please be advised should I be legally confronted on this matter, I will do my utmost own everything that this guy owns and will ever hope to own.
Legal opinions and judgements are best left to courts of law.
Ahhh...why would I imagine that you, who have no dog in this fight, would mind your own affairs?
...
Never invite a lawsuit.
.....
Anyone know anyone who comes even close in price? .....
Another site has a quite a few folks who have reported similar experiences to mine with the same seller.
What was really interesting to me was on the other site, no one has apparently found my post there to be legally irresponsible even though it is a direct copy of my post here. Maybe that occurred because no one there is an attorney or contends to be...or, on the other hand, maybe there really are some attorneys present...regardless, my intent was and remains that the money is not that big a deal. On the other hand, the language and the rip off is. Caveat emptor.
Legal opinions and judgements are best left to courts of law.
You are correct when you say that you are not an attorney. Perhaps you had better check with an attorney as to the basis of libel and/or slander. I assure you that I am not on shakey ground because there is a basis in fact of my allegations.
Color Film always existed. It's just the world was always black and white till recently.
The main issue is by revealing someone' 'private information' this would include name, address and so on, in a unflattering light can get you in legal trouble. You didn't pay attention to my link before, so here it is again:
I am putting it below:
LINK1
Well like with many things , theres hersey. Most of these bickering have to be taken with a grain of salt as theres always two sides to a story, or two faults to a problem.
You opened the can of worms by bickering bout the seller, its not exactly unfair of someone to ask how yourself may have conducted business with the guy.
Karl,
I am willing to grant you the latitude that you probably don't know all of the history behind the comment that I addressed...and, then you went on to pick up the lance. For the reason that you probably don't know the history, I will not tell you what first comes to mind.
For your information the four letter F words and the seven letter A words were all forthcoming from the seller when I asked him to send me the merchandise that I had bought and paid for several weeks ago. When I offered to trace the payment that he lied and said had not arrived, he went ballistic. His use of these derogatory terms were numerous, prolific, and redundantly indicative of his lack of knowledge of his native language.. I did not respond in kind, even though I was tempted when I received all six emails of like kind from the seller.
So I hope that answers your questions about how I conducted myself.
Were my experience isolated and solitary, I would have dealt with this matter via the resources available to me. I imagine there would be those who would have found fault with me had I not said anything and then when the next person experienced this in dealing with this seller and I would have then stated..."oh that happened to me too".
Some people are not satisfied no matter what one does...there are those who are excellent albeit uniformed "Monday Morning Quarterbacks"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?