My rule of thumb is that I don't buy if I have any reservations or can't stand the loss. Short of outright fraud I find buying on eBay as caveat emptor situation.
The question of the ethics of what you propose should be answered by you, and you alone.
But since you ask I'll answer for myself - I don't buy from anyone I think may be misleading or unethical. I would not feel so entitled unless there was provable outright fraud involved.
Rule of thumb: Untested=Not working. Another rule of thumb: Any vintage camera purchased will need repairs. Budget for them. Of my last eight purchases all eight needed some sort or repair. $125+ per repair. Luckily, for me 7 of the 8 were very inexpensive. Another rule of thumb that I discovered: If the body is in great shape it probably has been in storage for many, many years and will need a CLA. Almost every camera I pick up needs light seals.
Personally, if it is not listed as fully working condition I consider it as not working. I prefer local CL listings as at least I can exercise it to some extent. But of course anything unserviced can fail anytime thereafter. If I want something working with money back warranty then I buy from known reliable outlets.
I know that many old cameras are sold in the vintage section of ebay, and with that you "get what you get and you don't throw a fit". I also see that there are plenty of cameras sold in the regular photography section that theoretically should be covered by ebay guarantee that it is as listed (working / condition). But then I see many listers in that section are stating "not tested" "not sure if it works" etc. Has anyone taken advantage of this to buy a camera, test it and send it back if it doesn't work? Seller can't object since they didn't post it as vintage. Is that underhanded? Also I really have a feeling some unethical sellers list cameras as "untested" because they know they are broken. Has anyone run into this issue, and if it went to the ebay arbitrator do they have protections for selling something "not tested" in a section for fully functioning cameras?
I know, but my budget is hydrox not oreos. Am I really doing much damage sending a non working camera back and telling them to list it in the proper section as non- working parts or vintage. They get the camera back and I get my money back. Also with seals, at what condition should light seals expected to be good or bad. I picked up a camera listed ex+++ (it turned out to be an exaggeration) but the seals were bad. I asked for a discount to replace seals.
Seller can't object since they didn't post it as vintage. Is that underhanded?
No its called fraud.
What you propose is as bad as you are saying sellers are.
First there is no rule on ebay that selling in the regular section a body needs to be in working condition.If the seller says untested then the risk is on your side, if you buy an untested camera and you test it and find faults that does not mean you can return it.
Sellers are getting burned because knobs are returning perfectly functional cameras and complaining. Many times they damage the cameras themselves costing the seller money, other times they remove parts they want and send back a body missing pieces or ruin shutters purposely etc.
Whats your ebay name?
If you got a camera that was "untested" then that's what you got...a grab bag chance camera. Who cares what section it's in?I know, but my budget is hydrox not oreos. Am I really doing much damage sending a non working camera back and telling them to list it in the proper section as non- working parts or vintage. They get the camera back and I get my money back. Also with seals, at what condition should light seals expected to be good or bad. I picked up a camera listed ex+++ (it turned out to be an exaggeration) but the seals were bad. I asked for a discount to replace seals.
I tend towards this school of thought. Especially if the item is big-ticket. I don't like hassles.My rule of thumb is that I don't buy if it does not come from KEH, a trusted store, APUG or Large Format Photography Forum. I am willing to pay a little more for peace of mind and not having to fight uphill battles.
I know, but my budget is hydrox not oreos. Am I really doing much damage sending a non working camera back and telling them to list it in the proper section as non- working parts or vintage. They get the camera back and I get my money back. Also with seals, at what condition should light seals expected to be good or bad. I picked up a camera listed ex+++ (it turned out to be an exaggeration) but the seals were bad. I asked for a discount to replace seals.
If you got a camera that was "untested" then that's what you got...a grab bag chance camera
that is why you ask quetions before you buy, and read a seller's feedback rating.
there are plenty of sellers with good feedback as sellers + buyers who sell untested things
if it is untested you can email them and explain how to test it so they know, maybe they don't know
and it it really did come from their friend's friend's grandmother's attic who knows ...
its not fraud unless they knowingly deceive
im not sure what the word "vintage" has to do with anything, is that some sort of code for antique / does not work ?
the things i tend to go by is that sellers love to make things sound/seem better than they are .
look at the photos and if it doesn't seem true it might not be ...
ALSO cameras, lenses and shutters will always need a CLA when they are purchased ..
i know of 2 seller of large format lenses on ebay who have had their lenses on ebay for a long long long time,
and both knowingly decieve potential buyers ...
the only thing one can do is report the fraudsters to ebay if you KNOW they are coming fraud so ebay can weed them out.
I know, but my budget is hydrox not oreos.
that is why you ask quetions before you buy, and read a seller's feedback rating.
there are plenty of sellers with good feedback as sellers + buyers who sell untested things
if it is untested you can email them and explain how to test it so they know, maybe they don't know
and it it really did come from their friend's friend's grandmother's attic who knows ...
its not fraud unless they knowingly deceive
im not sure what the word "vintage" has to do with anything, is that some sort of code for antique / does not work ?
the things i tend to go by is that sellers love to make things sound/seem better than they are .
look at the photos and if it doesn't seem true it might not be ...
ALSO cameras, lenses and shutters will always need a CLA when they are purchased ..
i know of 2 seller of large format lenses on ebay who have had their lenses on ebay for a long long long time,
and both knowingly decieve potential buyers ...
the only thing one can do is report the fraudsters to ebay if you KNOW they are coming fraud so ebay can weed them out.
If I'm not mistaken, the buyer protection is for nondelivery or not as described. "Untested" is exactly that - a nonstatement about functionality. What isn't said is just as important to consider as what is said. Just like when buying a used car.I'm not near my computer, but I think the antique (or is it vintage) doesn't have buyer protections that something will work. Maybe their risk is having something returned that they put in an a better section to get more views / more money instead of marking it as a parts camera because they do not know it works.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?