Ammonium Dichromate vs Potassium Dichromate in Gum Printing

Robert Ley

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
665
Location
Buffalo, New
Format
Multi Format
I have been using Potassium Dichromate for gum printing and due to circumstances my exposures are between 20-25 minutes. I understand that Ammonium Dichromate is faster and I may be able to lower my exposure times. Is it a good rule of thumb to half your exposure times with Ammonium Dichromate? Also are there other variables to take into account between the two chemicals?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Ammonium dichromate may be harder to obtain as it is flammable and therefore there may be an additional HAZMAT charge.
 
OP
OP

Robert Ley

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
665
Location
Buffalo, New
Format
Multi Format
Gerald,
I already have the ammonium dichromate. Just interested in others experiences


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,106
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
It is not faster except by weight, AD has more dichromate ions (that do the heavy lifting) than PD since the Potassium part weighs more than Ammonium part relative to the amount of Chromium. Add a touch more PD and you'll get the same results...but the difference is not by a factor of two.

PD K2Cr2O7
AD (NH4)2Cr2O7

There are some other differences such as AD can go into a stronger concentration in water than PD before its starts to precipitate out.

Hope I have that all right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
At equal concentrations, AD will be more sensitive due to more chromium(IV), other than that I have not observed any difference.

Although the information is not directly related to gum printing, it seems ammonium dichromate produces better images compared to potassium dichromate in holography. The principles are almost the same colloid + dichromate exposed under UVA light. There are people who use PVA(polyvinyl alcohol) as gum arabic substitute, so I think it is fair to say technically AD could be better than PD (I am not sure if that is observable in gum prints). http://holoforum.org/data/doc/Lessard-PVA_dichromate.pdf
 
OP
OP

Robert Ley

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
665
Location
Buffalo, New
Format
Multi Format
I tried doubling the KDc in a printing session the other evening and was getting much better exposure times in the range of 8-10 minutes. I mixed the gum and dichromate at a 1:2 ratio gum to dichromate.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…