Ambrotype on dry plate?

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council

Advertiser

Joined

May 24, 2005

Messages

11,546

Location

Washington DC

Format

Multi Format

• May 15, 2006

• #1

Can Ambrotypes be done on dry plate glass? or do they have to be done with wet-plate collodion?

 

JG Motamedi

Member

Joined

Dec 18, 2004

Messages

472

Location

Portland, OR

Format

Large Format

• May 15, 2006

• #2

You could produce a dryplate ambrotype using collodion, with coffee or tannin as a preservative, and developing it in pyro. Works fine, but really slow.

Wondering about those plateholders?

 

Wayne

Member

Joined

Jul 8, 2005

Messages

3,584

Location

USA

Format

Large Format

• May 15, 2006

• #3

slower than normal?


Wayne

 

JG Motamedi

Member

Joined

Dec 18, 2004

Messages

472

Location

Portland, OR

Format

Large Format

• May 15, 2006

• #4

slower than normal?

Click to expand...

yes, about two stops...

 

OP

OP

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council

Advertiser

Joined

May 24, 2005

Messages

11,546

Location

Washington DC

Format

Multi Format

• May 15, 2006

• #5

I was up to visit Rob Gibson's studio in Gettysburg over the weekend, and was looking at how neat the ambrotypes are. I've got some 5x7 dry plate holders I'd be interested in learning with, and I just don't want to go through the hassle of getting another entirely new camera, with all the attendant wet plate gear.

 

Wayne

Member

Joined

Jul 8, 2005

Messages

3,584

Location

USA

Format

Large Format

• May 15, 2006

• #6

that speed loss could be a real killer. What is the practical speed of a wet plate- 1? 1/2? Just wild guesses, but I'm sure someone here knows.


Wayne

 

JG Motamedi

Member

Joined

Dec 18, 2004

Messages

472

Location

Portland, OR

Format

Large Format

• May 15, 2006

• #7

I generally shoot my portraits at 1 second at f/4, on a good day the meter says 12.66ev on skin. So, maybe .25 ISO?

jason

 

c6h6o3

Member

Joined

Oct 16, 2002

Messages

3,215

Format

Large Format

• May 15, 2006

• #8

TheFlyingCamera said:

I was up to visit Rob Gibson's studio in Gettysburg over the weekend,

Click to expand...

Where else did you guys go?

 

Wayne

Member

Joined

Jul 8, 2005

Messages

3,584

Location

USA

Format

Large Format

• May 15, 2006

• #9

JG Motamedi said:

I generally shoot my portraits at 1 second at f/4, on a good day the meter says 12.66ev on skin. So, maybe .25 ISO?

jason

Click to expand...

Well heck, then you're only looking at a few seconds or so for dry plate portraits. Thats doable, and thats what I'd like to try someday.



Wayne

 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber

Joined

Jan 19, 2005

Messages

12,293

Location

North Carolina

Format

Multi Format

• May 16, 2006

• #10

For whatever it's worth, the ambrotype effect (scattering from the silver image showing as positive against an absorptive black background) is perfectly operant with gelatin emulsions; I know of no reason you couldn't make ambrotypes with dry gelatin plates (some purists may claim the gelatin emulsion won't look just like the collodon, and they might be right, but developing with collodion chemistry would be a good start).

From what I hear, though, don't trust the Rockland Colloid "tintype" developer; it's bad about as often as it's good, and their (gelatin) tintype emulsion (which would also work for ambrotype) is too expensive to waste that frequently...

 

htmlguru4242

Member

Joined

Aug 9, 2005

Messages

1,012

Location

Eastern NC, USA

Format

Multi Format

• May 17, 2006

• #11

I'd imagine that it'd work. Some of my regular negatives (Tri-X, etc.) that are underexposed show the "ambrotype" posibtive effect when placed on a black background. You could definetely do this well if you tried to refine it ...