• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Amaloco H10

Inconsequential

H
Inconsequential

  • 0
  • 0
  • 18
Emi on Fomapan 400

A
Emi on Fomapan 400

  • 5
  • 3
  • 81

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,797
Messages
2,830,363
Members
100,958
Latest member
jjjimages
Recent bookmarks
0

IngMacca

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
37
Location
Italy
Format
Multi Format
Anyone experienced with this wetting agent?

In the suggested diluition (2 -5 ml / l) I cannot get a good result... and I see many stains on my film.
I use common water, non distilled.

Thanks a lot
 

LAG

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
The moon
Format
Multi Format
Excuse me

In my opinion, there's some information missing in this equation
 
OP
OP
IngMacca

IngMacca

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
37
Location
Italy
Format
Multi Format
My washing method?

Ilford 5 + 10 + 20 with normal water
and then 3 minutes with amaloco H10 just rotating spirals...
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,675
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
It depends on what kind of stains you have...

Is your water extremely hard? If so, no amount of wetting agent is going to stop you from getting deposits on your negatives. I always used distilled water plus wetting agent for the final rinse. This allows the dissolved minerals from your wash water (tap water) to leach out of the emulsion. Distilled is cheap; give it a try for the final rinse.

Doremus
 

Pat Erson

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
336
Format
35mm RF
"rotating spirals" : you should do this once and very gently. Your solution of water and wetting agent should not foam (or just a bit). Be slow and careful when you remove a spool from the tank to hang the film : again you want to avoid any foam in the tank.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,335
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
It seems to me that there is very little in a wetting agent that can cause problems by itself. The only other ingredient is the water so try mixing the wetting agent with distilled water. A minute's immersion of the film should be enough. Shake as much wetting agent off as possible and then draw the film between your middle fingers to push the remaining agent to the bottom of the film. Hang up to dry and seen if this makes a difference.

pentaxuser
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
A film need be dunked only briefly (a few seconds) in any diluted wetting agent. Letting it soak for several minutes is unnecessary. You also have to be careful not to use too much of the wetting agent. I know that this can cause problems with Photo-Flo like greasy spots. I would assume that other wetting agents would behave the same.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,675
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
A film need be dunked only briefly (a few seconds) in any diluted wetting agent. Letting it soak for several minutes is unnecessary. You also have to be careful not to use too much of the wetting agent. I know that this can cause problems with Photo-Flo like greasy spots. I would assume that other wetting agents would behave the same.

Gerald,

Of course, you are correct if all that is needed is to break the surface tension of the water. If, however, your negative contains a significant amount of dissolved minerals from hard water or a water softener, then a longer soak is needed to get these down to a level where they won't form crusty deposits on the negative when it dries. Hence my advice for a longer soak in distilled water plus wetting agent after the wash. Killing two birds with one stone as it were. I used to process in an area with lots of calcium carbonate in the water. Without 2-3 minutes in a distilled-water bath, I'd get deposits.

Best,

Doremus
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Gerald,

Of course, you are correct if all that is needed is to break the surface tension of the water. If, however, your negative contains a significant amount of dissolved minerals from hard water or a water softener, then a longer soak is needed to get these down to a level where they won't form crusty deposits on the negative when it dries. Hence my advice for a longer soak in distilled water plus wetting agent after the wash. Killing two birds with one stone as it were. I used to process in an area with lots of calcium carbonate in the water. Without 2-3 minutes in a distilled-water bath, I'd get deposits.

Best,

Doremus

I have never experienced hardness spotting on the emulsion side of film. I believe that any ions such as calcium are trapped by electrostatic forces in the emulsion and never make it to the surface. However I have experienced spotting on the base side from using too much surfactant like Photo-Flo. For most of my life I have lived in areas with very hard water. Roughly half the water processing stations in the US are in areas with hard to very hard water (values greater than 120 mg/l).

The hardness of water is easily measured using a standard soap solution. Small amounts of the soap solution are added to a sample until there is some foaming upon shaking. The hardness is easily calculated from the amount of standard soap solution added.

Hard water appears to have a protective action on the heart. However it is a problem in photography and bad for making whisky. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom