rpavich
Member
I've been shooting film for a few years and started out scanning my negs and then moved to printing black and white and only recently moved to printing color.
I recently took a trip to San Diego for my mom's 86th birthday and took mostly Kodak GC400 film (my normal film) but threw in a roll of Portra 400 just for the heck of it.
I made my contact sheets for each roll and then it hit me...why choosing what film to shoot in what circumstance was important when darkroom printing (as opposed to scanning) because that's the "pallet" you are given and that's it. Unlike scanning and Photoshop where anything can be anything, each film has it's "look" when printed. I was very surprised to see just how different Porta acted in the same situations as GC400.
I knew "intellectually" that this was the case but the point really wasn't driven home until now.
Interesting and It will inform my buying and shooting decisions in the future.
I recently took a trip to San Diego for my mom's 86th birthday and took mostly Kodak GC400 film (my normal film) but threw in a roll of Portra 400 just for the heck of it.
I made my contact sheets for each roll and then it hit me...why choosing what film to shoot in what circumstance was important when darkroom printing (as opposed to scanning) because that's the "pallet" you are given and that's it. Unlike scanning and Photoshop where anything can be anything, each film has it's "look" when printed. I was very surprised to see just how different Porta acted in the same situations as GC400.
I knew "intellectually" that this was the case but the point really wasn't driven home until now.
Interesting and It will inform my buying and shooting decisions in the future.