Aggressive Chemicals and Lens Coatings

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
That's a new one on me lol. And I've heard most optical myths. But seriously, the thermal shock of applying dry ice to a room temperature lens would shatter many optical glass types.

I'm currently restoring some civil war era windows. Everyone tells me the glass settles, getting thicker at the bottom. I've given up explaining that glass is an amorphous solid and does not settle - it was made that way, it's most likely cylinder glass.
One of my friends has a 3000 year old Phoenecian vase in a glass case in his living room. If glass settled with time, that vase would be a puddle, not a vase.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Does someone still make glass in that manner?

I've no idea, it's possible though - albeit not as a commercial/production operation. The panes in these windows are 30"x 15 3/8" which seems too big for bull's eye glass.
There was a local glassworks in Redford N.Y, but it closed in 1851.
 
OP
OP

T42

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
127
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
35mm

I've heard something like "Glass is really a liquid, not a solid." But you can't prove it by me. I have no earthly idea why anybody thinks that, but maybe whoever told you that "settling theory" had heard the same idea someplace.

Thanks to everyone in the thread for your inputs. It has been a fascinating read and learning experience.

Henry in Atlanta (the OP)
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
Hydrogen peroxide has occasionally been used to treat / remove e.g. fungus (Zeiss does this). Coatings are pretty darned hard. That said, rubbing a snot-rag you've dropped out of your pocket onto the sand and then rubbed it on a $3,000 lens ... expect trouble!! In my long experience I think it is non-existent to get something unmoveable on a lens. In the first instance, protect the front element with a filter.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,975
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
There isn't any need to know, just use products that are proprietary lens cleaning fluids and marketed as such , I use an American one called "Eclipse" that's brilliant, and "R.O.R" is also very good.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,278
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
coating or Blooming was known about from 19th century but Zeiss had the first practical process as a military patent secret just before WWII so 88mm anti air gun sights and contax II Sonnars.

It wasn't a military secret, Zeiss were selling some coated lenses in 1937/8 before WWII, I've seen a 150mm f4.5 T coated Tessar that dates to 1937/8 and they had begun coating some of the faster 35mm lenses as well but it was a limited range of coated lenses.

TTH Cooke were coating lenses before Zeiss but not for commercial production.

Ian
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I've heard something like "Glass is really a liquid, not a solid." But you can't prove it by me. I have no earthly idea why anybody thinks that, but maybe whoever told you that "settling theory" had heard the same idea someplace.

Our teacher chemistry told us he'd put his glasses each night on the table the other side up to avoid viscous flow of the glass...


A good example of glass being not crystal can be seen at any gadget shop where you find massive pieces of glass with some 3-D image inside.
Here the structure of the glass, by means of radiation, has been changed into a crystal state.

Same artefacts at heat formed glass plates are due to crystallisation too.
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
All matter has viscosity/fluidity until its temperature reaches 'absolute zero' but for all practical 'human purposes' glass is a solid.
 

Nodda Duma

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
2,685
Location
Batesville, Arkansas
Format
Multi Format
Uh....are you confusing material properties with thermodynamics? I think you might be.
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
Uh....are you confusing material properties with thermodynamics? I think you might be.

Probably... I can't remember. My point is, for all practical human purposes, glass is a solid.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,575
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
If a lens can't be cleaned with Windex or alcohol it has permanent damage in my opinion.
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,224
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
If a lens can't be cleaned with Windex or alcohol it has permanent damage in my opinion.
Just a beginner, and new to all this, but.......whenever i read "these" types of posts, I always wonder what the heck guys have on their lens.
Shooting 35mm, all my lenses are circa 1975, just like everybody else has, and I have never seen a lens that could not be cleaned with just some distilled water. and a drop of soap. Baring some Very Rough tissues and Very Strong chemicals, how many years would it take to "ruin" a lens.?
I am not talking about looking at the lens and seeing something under magnification, but to actually see it, in a blind test, on a print.?

I do not have the knowledge or experience to say for sure, so I use that Eclipse product and the disposable, lint free, lens tissues. But like I say, what on Earth are guys trying to clean.? What are guys getting on their lens, and then not being able to clean it with some type of Water/Alcohol fluid.?
I understand the glass is coated for photographic reasons, so the coating has to be considered.
But just because you can see microscopic "contaminants" in distilled water or 90% alcohol, does that translate to any real world problems.? Does lens cleaning get more scrutinized than can be seen in the photographic prints.?
Thank You
 

sfaber17

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
245
Location
Illinois
Format
35mm
Your Arkansas Sky formula has 91% Isopropyl drug store alcohol in it, so I'm confused.

 

Nodda Duma

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
2,685
Location
Batesville, Arkansas
Format
Multi Format
Your Arkansas Sky formula has 91% Isopropyl drug store alcohol in it, so I'm confused.

No need for confusion. Come to the inevitable conclusion that I must substitute lab grade 99.9% isopropyl for that ingredient.

Or...try it yourself and see if it's good enough for you.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,153
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
I dont know if it is the same thing, because Ive never looked at it with a microscope, but some lenses have seemed to have hard water stains.. probably from being cleaned with tap water or cleaner that did not use distilled water.
Have you tried vinegar, then quickly following up with alcohol?


 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…