thank you for your replyThey are intended for a workflow with fixed pameters, without using a lightmeter..Such films are typically offered without stating their sensitivity. Being extremely contrasty this depends on the developer and with orthochromatic, or even spectrally unsentized on the light source.
you are absolutely right ..@mohmad khatab: I think what @AgX means is that this film is not meant to be used for pictorial purposes. If you develop a small strip of film, you might get more info about the film in the writing between the sprocket holes.
You are amazing man, may God bless you
Yes.@mohmad khatab: I think what @AgX means is that this film is not meant to be used for pictorial purposes.
great ,,Yes.
I thought the term Dokumenten Film already said enough.
These films typically were used to reproduce texts or graphics. The were used by amateurs too, for recording documents or to make graphics from continuos tone negatives. The latter is something completely negated here at Apug. In this case the document film yields an interpostive, which is used to expose onto photographic paper directly, or by means of copying onto a second document film a internegative is made.
great ,,
If that reel came to you as a gift,
Or if you found it on the street.
How will you deal with it?
Yes I love this man with a beard and we respect each otherDaniel Keating
Well, no problem, my friend.These films were not made for amateurs, not for pictorial use, not for continuous tones, but for a commercial, fixed set/up for repetitive use. The commercial client then by trial could find out how to expose and develop.
For a later film Agfa published even a broshure for amateur use.
You are truly a wonderful Australian man, I thank you from the bottom of my heart.Could this be the same Agfa film used by Holden and Weichert back about the same time as the use-by date on the can? Look up the H&W developer.
In a recent thread here Alan Johnson has compounded a 2-bath for this sort of film.
https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/developer-for-aviphot-pan-200.182434/
Don't be put off by the title and start reading from post #100. He uses Metol and CD4
I have been using Imagelink HQ ISO25 with a developer made with 0.5ml Rodinal and 0.5ml of HC110 (syrup) in 250ml water semi stand 40 mins.
Good luck.
Is the nature of the orthochromatic document film different from the nature of the astrum for aerial photography?Dilute developer with somewhat lower pH than normal might work for very high contrast films though there'll be significant speed loss. I got very nice results out of Micrat Orto, an orthochromatic document film sold by Astrum, by using dilute Kalogen with some sodium citrate. My Flickr stream has some examples in case you want to look at.
Yes brother, I have always been in love with the results of these wonderful pictures and I did not know that it was from a movie of the same category, I am very happy.using dilute Kalogen with some sodium citrate.
I read the topic, and I saw the final pictures, but I was not convinced by the results, the size of the grain is very large and the edges of the grain are prominent and recessed from the depth, which gives the shape of the grain a large sharpness that I do not like in this way.start reading from post #100. He uses Metol and CD4
Actually I have Rodinal, but I don't have a HC110 - but I have a PG110D, a recipe Uncle Raghu suggested, available on flickr. Based on Phindion + Ascorbic Acid + Borax in Propylene Glycol.I have been using Imagelink HQ ISO25 with a developer made with 0.5ml Rodinal and 0.5ml of HC110 (syrup) in 250ml water semi stand 40 mins.
Dimitri is a vain guy who doesn't know anything.. he's just a salesman. He doesn't know anything. He's not a photographer and he doesn't know anything about analog photography.,,I don't know if they are the same. You can ask Dmitriy and find out. By the way, Mikrat is a very slow speed film (ISO 3) and as such not useful for handheld photography. But it's a very fine grain and high resolution film that gave me very nice results in both negative and positive development. It gets scratched very easily and hence needs to be handled carefully.
Mohmad Khatab, Thank you for the unearned flattery. I am merely a reporter of old (H&W) history and recent (Alan Johnson). I was impressed with the huge enlargements possible of Alan's sample pics. Images that would cover a wall have no grain to my (poor) sight. The gradation is pictorial enough for me with this class of film. As the saying goes "Horses for courses"
Try my brew with some slow fine grain film with what you have. I hope it works well for you but we are talking v old film and don't ever forget these films demand superior lenses and an extraordinary hand control or you waste your time.
Good luck, again..
I am already thinking of doing positive development.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?