Affortable Rangefinder?

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format

I have a IIb, it's like having a Barnack Leica with a better viewfinder - one window and three(!) magnifications. Lovely little cameras, alas mine is in such nice condition I wouldn't use it for day-to-day walking around with. The build quality of these cameras is superb.
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,886
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
My recommendation would be to find one of the CV (Cosina Voigtlander) Bessa 35mm rangefinders. They are all great cameras and they are current so you are not trying to work with cameras that are 40 to 60 years old. The Bessa R takes the older threadmount (Leica Screw Mount - LTM) lenses, though Cosina Voigtlander has built new versions as well. The rest, Bessa R2A & M through Bessa R4 use the Leica M (bayonet) mount.

I personally work with the Bessa R, the Bessa R2C (uses the older Contax mount) and the Bessa R2M. They are all great cameras and, if you keep your eyes open, come up on E-Bay as well as the Rangefinder.com forum classifieds, on a relatively frequent basis. Prices are usually around $300 for the Bessa R, and a bit more expensive for the R2 or R3.

Of course there is always the older models of Leica, Nikon and Canon, not to mention fixed lens models that were put out by Kodak, Agfa and others in the 50s, and Japanese manufactured fixed lens versions from Konica and the like in the 70s. All good cameras and all are lots of fun.

Personally, my favorite is the Agfa Ambi-Silette rangefinder that was produced in the fifties. It was known as the "Poor Mans Leica" and has one of the best viewfinders I have ever seen. There were 4 lenses built for it.

Good luck with your search and have fun.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
Some cheaper RF cameras I've used that are well built with decent lenses are the Konica Auto S2 and the Ricoh 519. For compactness do not forget the Olympus XA. Great lens.
 

Lamar

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
375
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
35mm
I've read the Jupiter-12 rear element will make contact with the Bessa internals so that FSU lens would not be an option. I have one I use on my Zorki's though and I like it. At ~$100 avg for a good copy with caps it isn't bad for the price.

To the OP: I just got into RF's a few months ago and decided on Zorki RF's for some of the same reasons of economy you state. I'm an SLR guy and I just wanted to play around with RF's and see how I like them. I didn't, and still don't, want to invest a ton of money into an RF system. I did entertain the thought of getting one of the LSM Canon's but decided finish out my Zorki collection and stay with all FSU equipment. Word of warning about the FSU RF's though. I've purchased 4 Zorkis, one was for parts, one was 100% functional, the other two have slow speed shutter issues and some rear curtain speed issues, but they still take great photos. In my opinion you need to be mechanically minded and able to perform some minor maintenance on these things to keep them working and be able to work around minor problems. That being said, I am told that once these things have undergone a full CLA they work like a charm again. I have contacted Fedka to set up a CLA for at least one of my older ones to see if I can't get it to functioning at 100%.

Links to photos with my Zorki's (lens info on each photo):
'56 Zorki 3S: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9565031@N06/sets/72157642781383815/
'61 Zorki 4: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9565031@N06/sets/72157642780888575/
'71 Zorki 4: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9565031@N06/sets/72157642783363733/

 
Last edited by a moderator:

TeeSquare

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
10
Format
Multi Format
If you're patient, you can get a Nikon S2 with a 50 f/1.4 lens for less than $500.
 

TheToadMen

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,570
Location
Netherlands, EU
Format
Pinhole
If you're patient, you can get a Nikon S2 with a 50 f/1.4 lens for less than $500.

Please tell me where, I would like one too.
Seems like a very nice camera.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format

eskyone

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2002
Messages
310
Location
Escanaba Mic
Format
Medium Format
I just took the plunge into the shallow end of the pool after purchasing a bessa t for $202.00. The camera came with a Russian 50mm lens but needed a viewfinder. For under $300 I was operational. Unfortunately I took a few steps more toward the deep end when I picked up a voigtlander 50mm lens. I'm so far really thrilled with the quality of the bessa t.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format

markaudacity

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
156
Location
Houston TX USA
Format
Med. Format RF
Canon QL17, Minolta Hi-matic, Olympus 35SP. You can pick one of these up for under 200USD (under 100 if you shop around), and they all have tack-sharp lenses on them.
 

kintatsu

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
366
Location
Bavaria, Ger
Format
4x5 Format
I like my Canonet QL17 GIII and my Voightlander Vitomatic II. I've gotten some good stuff, and the Vitomatic was 39 Euros, the Canonet was free. A premium pricetag doesn't always mean the best gear!
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Minolta himatic 7s @ 40GBP, needed new foam otherwise Ex condition. Full programme or manual transfer of meter EV reading.
 

vpwphoto

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Messages
1,202
Location
Indiana
Format
Multi Format
Russian lenses, and Canon LTM. I really liked the P and the VL's aren't bad.
I had a Fed that was good enough too. Although the Canons have various fame lines.


^^^^ also agree the QL17 is a dandy handy camera, nice and sharp.

Warning... Leica CL.. the only camera(s) to let me down. Damn shutter damn the CL to hades!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,592
Format
35mm RF
How about a Retina IIa. I picked one up not so long ago for about £35. It has a Retina-Xenon F2/50mm and is a folder. The only 35mm camera I have that even in it's case fits in my coat pocket.
 

vpwphoto

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Messages
1,202
Location
Indiana
Format
Multi Format
How about a Retina IIa. I picked one up not so long ago for about £35. It has a Retina-Xenon F2/50mm and is a folder. The only 35mm camera I have that even in it's case fits in my coat pocket.

^^^ OP titled thread "Affordable Rangefinder". To me that means under $200, perhaps $60. USD. Those Retinas are almost in Leica territory over at e-bay. Not that they are selling.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,592
Format
35mm RF
^^^ OP titled thread "Affordable Rangefinder". To me that means under $200, perhaps $60. USD. Those Retinas are almost in Leica territory over at e-bay. Not that they are selling.

Well as mentioned I bought mine for £35, which equates to about $59 and I thought cameras were a lot cheaper in USA.
 

vpwphoto

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Messages
1,202
Location
Indiana
Format
Multi Format
Sorry ... I wasn't familiar with the Retina you mentioned... found several on ebay with asking prices well north of what you mention. Sorry... and thanks for the information.
 

chip j

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,193
Location
NE Ohio
Format
35mm
Contax G system

A rangefinder with autofocus?? Interesting. How does that work? Sounds like a contradictio in terminis to me.
Google Contax G @ Ken Rockwell. He says the G2 has it all over any Leica.
 

Regular Rod

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
665
Location
Derbyshire
Format
Medium Format
Surely if low cost is of prime importance and in despite of this, high quality is desired too, then is it not best to concentrate of medium format rangefinder cameras?

AGFA Record III, Mamiya - 6 folding, Zeiss IKONTA 524/2, MOCKBA-5 and so on are not expensive even now and all have very good lenses to deliver high quality results that will compare well with those from more expensive 35mm rangefinder cameras.

RR
 

GRHazelton

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
2,249
Location
Jonesboro, G
Format
Multi Format
Voigtlander Vitessa L?

Excellent f2 Ultron, coupled rangefinder with parallax correction, excellent ergonomics - left hand advances film with plunger, right hand focus and shutter, coupled depth of field scale on top panel, flash MXV connector on left hand barn door. Incredible "cool" factor, engendered with plunger, "barn door" lens closure, superlative build/finish quality.

Minuses - (and ALL cameras have them, even the sainted Leicas! Think cloth focal plane shutters and the sun!) Age. Mid to late '50s. My understanding is that any rangefinder work is hideously expensive. That &^%$*I)(*(*& LVS EVS interlock system, although it could be disabled. And who though that a fully removeable back was a good thing? Grrrrrr..... Filters use a sort of bayonet system, which makes them rare and consequently expensive, when available. Same for the "proper" lens hood. Many have a built in selenium cell meter, which may or may not work; in any case rely on your hand held Weston or Norwood Director, to be in "style."

But there are a lot of them out there. Figure about $200 for a decent example. Not a bad price for a true icon.

Still. If a Vitessa L needs shutter work it should be "cheap," comparatively. It is a delightful user. All you need is a '55 Chevy Bel Air convertible to really rock in style.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…