I admit it took me a while to realize what that FL factor was about. As at the first moment I thought of a device, controlled by the body, twisting the focus barrel of the lens. (Seemingly I have a real retro-day...) Then I realized that the whole article would only make sense concerning a focussing lens element making part of a converter. And so it turned out to be.
It further turned out that I never read that Peterson book completely. I mean there are so many Nikon converters, do I really have to read about each detail of each of them? Seemingly, yes.
But aside from that FL-factor (similar to a standard tele-converter), those Nikon converters had the disadvantage of a limited focus range.
Thus one had to roughly focus the lens manually, and then let the converter do the rest. Not that bad.
But I guess if the converter has just gone to its limits, even with roughly prefocussing for a new shoot it might not have been able to focus.
(I see, PhotoJim just hinted at the same point.)