Advice Sought

Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 2
  • 0
  • 21
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 1
  • 2
  • 35
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 40

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,826
Messages
2,781,492
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0

PhotoBob

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
589
Location
Abbotsford, BC
Format
Multi Format
Been thinking about getting rid of the 645 ProTL and move to a 35 rangefinder, e.g. Zeiss Ikon.
Not sure however, if I will be happy with a rangefinder over my comfort with SLR.
I won't have the flexibility in lenses nor lenses of a reasonable price.
If I'm not mistaken, close focusing is a problem or not possible with rangerfinders.
But yet, this type of camera interests me.
If I can get a good price for the 645, it might make it a bit easier to secure a camera with at least a 35mm lens.
I know there is a dealer in far off Ontario, but I don't know of any one here that carries such gear that I could handle and try out, thus ... I sure would appreciate thoughts or comments - thank you.
 

dslater

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
740
Location
Hollis, NH
Format
35mm
Hi Bob,
Rangefinders are quite different from SLR's - in addition you'll be changing film format. I'd suggest that before you get rid of your 645, why don't you get a Canonet QL17 III. You should be able to pick up one in good condition for around $80.00. It has a fixed 40mm f/1.7 lens - but the lens is in fact excellent. The rangefinder works well - is easily adjusted, and has parallax correction.
In my opinion, it's great camera for getting the hang of a rangefinder and seeing of you like rangefinders.

Dan
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I do not know whether or not you use a polorizing filter on your SLR, using one on a RF or TLR camera is difficult at best.

Steve
 

jd callow

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 31, 2003
Messages
8,466
Location
Milan
Format
Multi Format
I have no problems using plarizers or ND grads with good or intended results on RF's. It does require that you both look and think opposed to mostly look. Polarizers are easier than grads, but both are pretty simple.
 

Nicole

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
2,562
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Format
Multi Format
Bob, I suggest hiring/renting what you're considering buying for a few days and give it a good workout with several rolls to see if you can "work together". :smile: Is there anyone closer even with just any type of rangefinder to see if this switch suits you?
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Bob that is quite a leap. I'd say keep 'em both, at least for a while. They have entirely different capabilities.

If expense is an issue then you might consider starting with a bessa.

I hope that you are considering the many MF RF options...
 
OP
OP
PhotoBob

PhotoBob

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
589
Location
Abbotsford, BC
Format
Multi Format
Thanks a bunch
Yeah, haven't decided to dump 645, just thinking...
The 7II seems like a nice system as well ... more to think about.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom