Advice re: circa 1937 European camera aperture markings please

What is this?

D
What is this?

  • 3
  • 9
  • 94
On the edge of town.

A
On the edge of town.

  • 7
  • 6
  • 186
Peaceful

D
Peaceful

  • 2
  • 12
  • 342
Cycling with wife #2

D
Cycling with wife #2

  • 1
  • 3
  • 126

Forum statistics

Threads
198,289
Messages
2,772,390
Members
99,592
Latest member
gregmulvey
Recent bookmarks
0

jmccl@yahoo.com

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
110
Location
South of Salt Lake City
Format
Multi Format
Hello all. I am acquiring a circa 1937 French manufactured 6X9 folder. Shutter speeds are 100, 50, 25, B, T. Aperture markings are 25 18 12,5 9 and 6,3. It is a 105mm lens. I am acustomed to the more traditional - - - 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22 - - - aperture markings that I have on my Zeiss 105mm 6X9. Does anybody have any insight into this different scale on the French 1937 model vs the 1951 Zeiss? I plan to shoot using sunny 16 conventions so I imagine I will just interpolate on the aperture scale. It is curious to me why the difference in the scale markings. Somebody out there in APUG land probably has some insight on this. By the way, I plan to use this vintage French camera to capture some ikonic (it's not just a Zeiss word ;-}) French landmarks during my September invasion of the continent. I also have a 1941 Argus C3 (ala Tony Vaccaro) to use while in the Normandy invasion locales.

Thanks for all responses.

Jim
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
That is an old and discontinued aperture scale. Ive heard it called the Continental scale. I have a leitz lens like that. Just interpolate like you surmised. Other old aperture scale systems require conversion charts, but not this one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Was one invasion not enough? Do you really need to make another?
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
Long ago some lens apertures were marked in full stops from the largest aperture, as in the OP's example. It may seem less logical to one who uses a variety of lenses, but makes sense enough for a one-camera photographer.
 

Ian C

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
1,241
Format
Large Format
The obsolete aperture number sequence: f/6.3, f/9, f/12.5, f/18, f/25 passes 1/3 stop less light than the modern conventional sequence f/5.6, f/8, f/11, f/16, f/22.

Thus

f/6.3 passes 1/3 stop less light than f/5.6

f/9 passes 1/3 stop less light than f/8

f/12.5 passes 1/3 stop less light than f/11

f/18 passes 1/3 stop less light than f/16

f/25 passes 1/3 stop less light than f/22
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
So, if one started with an odd f-stop number with the largest aperture it made sense to go on with it for the smaller ones.

Unless exposure meters etc. got the even numbers...
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,150
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
Long ago some lens apertures were marked in full stops from the largest aperture, as in the OP's example.

This is not the case here. It's a normal and typical european aperture scale from that period. It's the same scale as the modern, just different numbers.

There's no need to interpolate on it, since the shutter speeds are slower. If your exposure meter says aperture 8 and 1/125 use aperture 9 and 1/100 sec.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom